Foreign institutional ownership and the effectiveness of technical analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Chung, Chien-Ping [1 ]
Chien, Cheng-Yi [2 ]
Huang, Chia-Hsin [3 ]
Lee, Hsiu-Chuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Feng Chia Univ, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Fortek Comp Co, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Ming Chuan Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Technical analysis; Information asymmetry; Information uncertainty; Institutional ownership; Return volatility; INVESTORS; PROFITABILITY; PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; VOLATILITY; EFFICIENCY; LIQUIDITY; BEHAVIOR; RETURNS; STOCKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2021.08.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A B S T R A C T This paper investigates whether the effectiveness of technical analysis using a moving average (MA) approach varies with the level of information asymmetry. Using foreign institutional ownership as the proxy of information asymmetry, our empirical results indicate that moving average timing strategies for low foreign institutional ownership portfolios outperform buy-and-hold strategies. The effect holds after controlling the influence of information uncertainty suggested by Han et al. (2013). Moreover, the profitability of portfolios with low foreign institutional ownership increases along with information uncertainty. Finally, abnormal returns for MA strategies conditional on foreign institutional ownership are still significantly positive after controlling for Fama and French's (1993) three-factor model, market conditions, and market timing abilities. Our evidence therefore concludes that, in addition to informa-tion uncertainty, information asymmetry is another driving force affecting the effectiveness of technical analysis. (c) 2021 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 96
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Pevzner, Mikhail
    Xin, Xiangang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2019, 50 (01) : 83 - 110
  • [2] Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership
    Jeong-Bon Kim
    Mikhail Pevzner
    Xiangang Xin
    [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50 : 83 - 110
  • [3] Institutional distance and ownership in foreign acquisitions
    Gaur, Ajai
    Malhotra, Shavin
    Zhu, PengCheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 28 (02)
  • [4] Foreign institutional ownership and corporate labor investment
    Do, Trung K.
    Le, Anh-Tuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2024,
  • [5] FOREIGN OWNERSHIP AND TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY IN BANKING IN TRANSITION COUNTRIES: A DEA ANALYSIS
    Weill, Laurent
    [J]. REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2006, 57 (05): : 1093 - 1108
  • [6] Foreign institutional ownership externalities and supplier innovation
    Yi, Zhaoying
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Wei, Minghai
    Lin, Bingxuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2023, 80
  • [7] Foreign ownership and bribery: Agency and institutional perspectives
    Yi, Jingtao
    Teng, Da
    Meng, Shuang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 27 (01) : 34 - 45
  • [8] Foreign institutional ownership and Cross-Listing
    Kong, Xiangting
    Ng, Jeff
    Tsang, Albert
    Yan, Shuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2024, 140
  • [9] Foreign institutional ownership and liquidity commonality around the world
    Deng, Baijun
    Li, Zhongfei
    Li, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 51 : 20 - 49
  • [10] Foreign and local institutional ownership and the speed of price adjustment
    Park, Young K.
    Chung, Kee H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2007, 34 (9-10) : 1569 - 1595