Predictors of additional intraocular pressure reduction in patients changed to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination

被引:6
|
作者
Sellem, Eric [1 ]
Rouland, Jean Francois [2 ]
Baudouin, Christophe [3 ]
Bron, Alain [4 ]
Denis, Philippe [5 ]
Nordmann, Jean-Philippe [6 ]
Renard, Jean Paul [7 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ophtalmol Kleber, F-69006 Lyon, France
[2] Hop Huriez, Dept Ophthalmol, F-59037 Lille, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Natl Quinze Vingts, Ophthalmol Dept 3, Paris 12, France
[4] Hop Gen, Dept Ophthalmol, F-21033 Dijon, France
[5] Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Ophthalmol, F-690437 Lyon 03, France
[6] Ctr Hosp Natl Quinze Vingts, Dept Ophthalmol, Paris 12, France
[7] Hop Instruct Armees Val de Grace, Dept Ophthalmol, Paris 05, France
关键词
OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; EFFICACY; TIMOLOL; SAFETY; PROGRESSION; REPLACEMENT; MONOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2415-10-10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: Given the growing number of ocular hypotensive medications available, it is important to be able to predict a positive response to therapy. The purpose of the present study was to identify predictors of an additional 10% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after 12 weeks of treatment with latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (FC) in patients requiring a change in their previous ocular hypotensive medication. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, prospective, phase IIIb study included subjects >= 18 years of age with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Eligible subjects had baseline IOP >= 21 mmHg and insufficient response to current beta-blocker monotherapy. The primary efficacy analysis (logistic regression) identified predictors of a positive response after 12 weeks of latanoprost/timolol FC. Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 383 subjects treated with >= 1 drop of FC and having >= 1 follow-up IOP assessment. Mean IOP was 22.19 +/- 2.16 mmHg at baseline and was reduced by 5.42 +/- 2.71 mmHg at study end. In all, 325 (84.9%) subjects had a positive response to latanoprost/timolol FC; the response rate was similar across groups: OAG (n = 208; 82.7%); OHT (n = 161; 87.6%); OAG+OHT (n = 14; 85.7%). Higher baseline IOP (odds ratio: 1.284; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.101, 1.497; p = 0.0014) and absence of adverse events (odds ratio: 0.318; 95% CI: 0.161, 0.629; p = 0.0010) were significant predictors of positive response. Age, gender, ethnic origin, diagnosis, family history of OAG/OHT, corneal thickness, and concomitant systemic beta-blocker were not significant predictors of a positive response in the ITT analysis. The FC was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were related to the eye and were consistent with known adverse events associated with latanoprost and timolol. Conclusions: These results support the use of latanoprost/ timolol FC in patients whose IOP is insufficiently controlled on beta-blocker monotherapy. Patients with higher baseline IOP levels and who do not experience adverse events while on therapy are most likely to achieve a positive response to latanoprost/ timolol FC.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of additional intraocular pressure reduction in patients changed to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination
    Eric Sellem
    Jean François Rouland
    Christophe Baudouin
    Alain Bron
    Philippe Denis
    Jean-Philippe Nordmann
    Jean Paul Renard
    [J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 10
  • [2] Comparison of the effects of bimatoprost and a fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol on circadian intraocular pressure
    Rossetti, Luca
    Karabatsas, Costas H.
    Topouzis, Fotis
    Vetrugno, Michele
    Centofanti, Marco
    Boehm, Andreas
    Viswanathan, Ananth
    Vorwerk, Christian
    Goldblum, David
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (12) : 2244 - 2251
  • [3] Dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost:: Effects on intraocular pressure and hemodynamics
    Janulevicienë, I
    Harris, A
    Kagemann, L
    Siesky, B
    McCranor, L
    [J]. ISOPT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2004, : 225 - 230
  • [4] The Efficacy of a Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Versus Latanoprost and Timolol Gel-forming Solution Unfixed Combination on Daytime Intraocular Pressure
    Ozyol, Erhan
    Ozyol, Pelin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (02) : 135 - 139
  • [5] 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure and Blood Pressure Levels with Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Versus Timolol
    Konstas, A. G. P.
    Pikilidou, M. I.
    Tsironi, S.
    Mikropoulos, D.
    Kozobolis, V. P.
    Sarafidis, P. A.
    Lasaridis, A. N.
    Nelson, L. A.
    Stewart, W. C.
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2009, 34 (05) : 369 - 377
  • [6] A comparison of the safety and intraocular pressure lowering of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with open-angle glaucoma
    Martinez, Antonio
    Sanchez, Manuel
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (05) : 1025 - 1032
  • [7] The effect on diurnal intraocular pressure of the fixed combination of latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5% in patients with ocular hypertension
    Larsson, LI
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 79 (02): : 125 - 128
  • [8] Using diurnal intraocular pressure fluctuation to assess the efficacy of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol versus latanoprost or timolol monotherapy
    Varma, R.
    Hwang, L-J
    Grunden, J. W.
    Bean, G. W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 94 (01) : 80 - 84
  • [9] Comparison of intraocular pressure lowering efficacy of fixed combination timolol-dorzolamide versus timolol plus latanoprost
    Lee, GC
    Katz, LJ
    Molineaux, J
    Fontanarosa, J
    Steinmann, WC
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [10] Administration of the fixed combination of latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5% in glaucoma patients with an intraocular pressure over 30 mmHg
    Ozkurt, Yelda Buyru
    Sengor, Tomris
    Evciman, Tufan
    Haboglu, Melih
    Bas, Gokcen
    Aydin, Sevda
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 3 : 337 - 339