Predicting Soil Erodibility Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography

被引:10
|
作者
Karim, Md Zahidul [1 ]
Tucker-Kulesza, Stacey E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
Scour; Electrical resistivity tomography; Erosion function apparatus; Receiver operating characteristic curve; CRITICAL SHEAR-STRESS; SEDIMENT EROSION; RIVER; RESISTANCE; APPARATUS; MODELS; DEVICE; EARTH; SAND; ROCK;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001857
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Scour is responsible for approximately 60% of all bridge collapses in the United States. A large number of bridges are listed in the National Bridge Inventory as scour critical; however, evaluating scour potential based on soil sampling and laboratory testing can be cost prohibitive, as erosion testing using available apparatuses is time consuming. Various soil characteristics that affect the erosion of soil also influence in situ bulk electrical resistivity (ER) measurements collected using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT). The objective of this study was to predict soil erodibility using ERT. Fourteen bridge sites were used for ERT and erosion testing. The results of this study indicate that an ER over 50m has a 93% probability of classifying the soil as high erodibility. As such, ERT can be used to rapidly prioritize existing bridges where soils near the surface are likely classified as highly erodible. These bridges would then require a more detailed investigation to characterize soil erosion potential. The application of using ERT to predict soil erodibility was validated using an additional experimental site.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting reliable soil profile using electrical resistivity survey
    Dafalla, Muawia A.
    Al Fouzan, Fouzan
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION 4, VOLS I AND II, 2013, : 971 - 976
  • [2] Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations
    Sudha, Kumari
    Israil, M.
    Mittal, S.
    Rai, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2009, 67 (01) : 74 - 79
  • [3] Predicting sandy-clayey soil properties using electrical resistivity testing
    Naseem, Ahsan
    Jalal, Fazal-e
    Naseem, Asad
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 173 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [4] Electrical Resistivity Tomography Using Wenner β-Schlumberger Configuration for Anomaly Detection in The Soil
    Pebriyanto, Y.
    Dahlan, K.
    Sari, Y. W.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON SCIENCES SCIENCES ON PRECISION AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE (ISS-2016), 2017, 58
  • [5] Mapping soil layers using electrical resistivity tomography and validation: Sandbox experiments
    Xu, Dong
    Sun, Ronglin
    Yeh, Tian-Chyi Jim
    Wang, Yu-Li
    Momayez, Moe
    Hao, Yonghong
    Lee, Cheng-Haw
    Hu, Xiangyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 575 : 523 - 536
  • [6] Soil water content monitoring on a dike model using electrical resistivity tomography
    Rings, Joerg
    Scheuermann, Alexander
    Preko, Kwasi
    Hauck, Christian
    [J]. NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 6 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [7] Electrical resistivity tomography to delineate greenhouse soil variability
    Rossi, R.
    Amato, M.
    Bitella, G.
    Bochicchio, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2013, 27 (02) : 211 - 218
  • [8] Measuring soil electrical resistivity using a resistivity box and a resistivity probe
    Sreedeep, S
    Reshma, AC
    Singh, DN
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2004, 27 (04): : 411 - 415
  • [9] Indirect root distribution characterization using electrical resistivity tomography in different soil conditions
    Giambastiani, Y.
    Errico, A.
    Preti, F.
    Guastini, E.
    Censini, G.
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2022, 67
  • [10] Monitoring of soil water content in Haloxylon ammodendron plantation using electrical resistivity tomography
    Gao, Junliang
    Luo, Fengmin
    Ma, Yingbin
    Zhang, Ge
    Hao, Yuguang
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34 (22): : 92 - 101