How software engineering research aligns with design science: a review

被引:26
|
作者
Engstrom, Emelie [1 ]
Storey, Margaret-Anne [3 ]
Runeson, Per [2 ]
Host, Martin [2 ]
Baldassarre, Maria Teresa [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Software Engn, Lund, Sweden
[3] Univ Victoria, Comp Sci, Victoria, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Bari, Bari, Italy
[5] Univ Bari, ISERN, Bari, Italy
关键词
Design science; Research review; Empirical software engineering; REPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10664-020-09818-7
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background Assessing and communicating software engineering research can be challenging. Design science is recognized as an appropriate research paradigm for applied research, but is rarely explicitly used as a way to present planned or achieved research contributions in software engineering. Applying the design science lens to software engineering research may improve the assessment and communication of research contributions. Aim The aim of this study is 1) to understand whether the design science lens helps summarize and assess software engineering research contributions, and 2) to characterize different types of design science contributions in the software engineering literature. Method In previous research, we developed a visual abstract template, summarizing the core constructs of the design science paradigm. In this study, we use this template in a review of a set of 38 award winning software engineering publications to extract, analyze and characterize their design science contributions. Results We identified five clusters of papers, classifying them according to their different types of design science contributions. Conclusions The design science lens helps emphasize the theoretical contribution of research output-in terms of technological rules-and reflect on the practical relevance, novelty and rigor of the rules proposed by the research.
引用
收藏
页码:2630 / 2660
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How software engineering research aligns with design science: a review
    Emelie Engström
    Margaret-Anne Storey
    Per Runeson
    Martin Höst
    Maria Teresa Baldassarre
    [J]. Empirical Software Engineering, 2020, 25 : 2630 - 2660
  • [2] Evaluation of Design Science instantiation artifacts in Software engineering research
    Mijac, Marko
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (CECIIS 2019), 2019, : 313 - 321
  • [3] Research Software Science: Expanding the Impact of Research Software Engineering
    Heroux, Michael A.
    [J]. COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2022, 24 (06) : 22 - 27
  • [4] Documenting research software in engineering science
    Sibylle Hermann
    Jörg Fehr
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [5] Documenting research software in engineering science
    Hermann, Sibylle
    Fehr, Joerg
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [6] A Review of How Whistleblowing is Studied in Software Engineering, and the Implications for Research and Practice
    Hunt, Lucy
    Ferrario, Maria Angela
    [J]. 2022 ACM/IEEE 44TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IN SOCIETY (ICSE-SEIS 2022), 2022, : 12 - 23
  • [7] Design science research for learning software engineering and computational thinking: Four cases
    Apiola, Mikko
    Sutinen, Erkki
    [J]. COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 29 (01) : 83 - 101
  • [8] Social Science Theories in Software Engineering Research
    Lorey, Tobias
    Ralph, Paul
    Felderer, Michael
    [J]. 2022 ACM/IEEE 44TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2022), 2022, : 1994 - 2005
  • [9] Software Engineering General Design Research
    Wang, Zhuyun
    [J]. ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 19 : 517 - 520
  • [10] Using a Visual Abstract as a Lens for Communicating and Promoting Design Science Research in Software Engineering
    Storey, Margaret-Anne
    Engstrom, Emelie
    Host, Martin
    Runeson, Per
    Bjarnason, Elizabeth
    [J]. 11TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT (ESEM 2017), 2017, : 181 - 186