The Linkages of Carbon Spot-Futures: Evidence from EU-ETS in the Third Phase

被引:22
|
作者
Chen, Hao [1 ]
Liu, Zhixin [1 ]
Zhang, Yinpeng [2 ]
Wu, You [3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, Shenzhen 518061, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
关键词
EU-ETS; DCC-GARCH; VAR-BEKK-GARCH; volatility spillover; hedge risk; DYNAMIC CONDITIONAL CORRELATION; VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS; EMISSION ALLOWANCES; PRICE DISCOVERY; INDEX FUTURES; GARCH MODELS; OIL SPOT; FUEL-OIL; MARKETS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/su12062517
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Based on the prices selected from European Energy Exchange (EEX) from 2013 to 2018, we investigate the inter-correlation of carbon spot and futures markets. Specifically, we adopt the widely used DCC-GARCH model and VAR-BEKK-GARCH model to conduct a comprehensive analysis on the carbon market, i.e., the dynamic correlation and volatility spillover between carbon spot and carbon futures. Moreover, we develop a hedge strategy based on the VAR-BEKK-GARCH model and calculate the hedging effectiveness (HE) value to evaluate the strategy performance. The empirical results show that (i) during our sample period, carbon spot and futures markets are highly correlated, (ii) carbon spot overflows to the futures market and vice versa, and (iii) the HE value is equal to 0.9370, indicating a good performance for the hedging strategy. Then, we provide further discussion on the relationship between carbon spot and futures markets by replacing our dataset with the data of phase II. The results do not change our conclusions on the dynamic correlation and volatility spillover. However, the HE value of phase III is higher than that of phase II, which indicates that the carbon futures market of phase III is not only an available market to hedge risk from the contemporaneous carbon spot market but also has a better hedge effectiveness than phase II.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonlinearities in carbon spot-futures price relationships during Phase II of the EU ETS
    Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi
    Jawadi, Fredj
    Nguyen, Duc Khuong
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (03) : 884 - 892
  • [2] Investor attention and carbon return: evidence from the EU-ETS
    Zhang, Yinpeng
    Chen, Ying
    Wu, You
    Zhu, Panpan
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 709 - 727
  • [3] Spillover effect between carbon spot and futures market: evidence from EU ETS
    Liu, Jian
    Tang, Shuai
    Chang, Chun-Ping
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (12) : 15223 - 15235
  • [4] Spillover effect between carbon spot and futures market: evidence from EU ETS
    Jian Liu
    Shuai Tang
    Chun-Ping Chang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 15223 - 15235
  • [5] Carbon market volatility analysis based on structural breaks: Evidence from EU-ETS and China
    Yu, Haixu
    Wang, He
    Liang, Chuanyu
    Liu, Zhaohua
    Wang, Susheng
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [6] Carbon Emissions Pricing: Linkages Between EU ETS Spot and Future Prices and Completeness of EU ETS Market
    Mondal, Saikat
    Pradhan, Rudra P.
    Madhavan, Vinodh
    Chatterjee, Debaleena
    Varghese, Ann Mary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKET FINANCE, 2024,
  • [7] The Analysis of Carbon Price Volatility Properties in EU-ETS
    Ye Bin
    Miao Lixin
    Yang Peng
    Jiang Jingjing
    [J]. MACHINERY, MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2015, : 625 - 632
  • [8] EU-ETS Phase III: How to auction permits?
    Mougeot, Michel
    Naegelen, Florence
    [J]. REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2009, 119 (02): : 165 - 184
  • [9] Carbon Content of Electricity Futures in Phase II of the EU ETS
    Fell, Harrison
    Hintermann, Beat
    Vollebergh, Herman
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (04): : 61 - 83
  • [10] Palm oil spot-futures relation: Evidence from unrefined and refined products
    Go, You-How
    Lau, Wee-Yeap
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2019, 65 (03): : 133 - 142