Factors Influencing Development and Implementation of Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records-A Comparative Study of Sweden and the Netherlands

被引:12
|
作者
Cijvat, Charlotte D. [1 ]
Cornet, Ronald [1 ]
Hagglund, Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Centra, Amsterdam Publ Hlth, Med Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
patient accessible electronic health record; open notes; patient portal; implementation; consolidated framework for implementation research; PATIENTS ONLINE ACCESS; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; INFORMATION; SYSTEMS; CARE; PERCEPTIONS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.621210
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) and associated national policies have increasingly been set up over the past two decades. Still little is known about the most effective strategy for developing and implementing PAEHRs. There are many stakeholders to take into account, and previous research focuses on the viewpoints of patients and healthcare professionals. Many known barriers and challenges could be solved by involving end-users in the development and implementation process. This study therefore compares barriers and facilitators for PAEHR development and implementation, both general and specific for patient involvement, that were present in Sweden and the Netherlands. Methods: There were a total of 14 semi-structured interviews with 16 key informants from both countries, on which content analysis was performed. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide both the construction of the interview guides and the content analysis. Outcomes: The main barriers present in both countries are resistance from healthcare professionals and technical barriers regarding electronic health record systems and vendors. Facilitators varied across the two contexts, where the national infrastructure and program management were highlighted as facilitators in Sweden and stakeholder engagement (including patients and healthcare professionals) was described as a facilitator in both contexts. Strong leadership was also described as a critical success factor, especially when faced with healthcare professional resistance. Conclusion: Most of the major barriers and facilitators from both countries are covered in existing literature. This study, however, identified factors that can be seen as more practical and that would not have arisen from interviews with patients or physicians. Recommendations for policymakers include keeping the mentioned barriers in mind from the start of development and paving the way for facilitators, mainly strict policies, learning from peer implementers, and patient involvement, when possible. Implementers should focus on strong decision-making and project management and on preparing the healthcare organization for the PAEHR.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patients' Online Access to Electronic Health Records: Current Status and Experiences from the Implementation in Sweden
    Hagglund, Maria
    Scandurra, Isabella
    [J]. MEDINFO 2017: PRECISION HEALTHCARE THROUGH INFORMATICS, 2017, 245 : 723 - 727
  • [2] Training physicians and residents for the use of Electronic Health Records-A comparative case study between two hospitals
    Humphrey-Murto, Susan
    Makus, Donovan
    Moore, Sarah
    Duffy, Karen Watanabe
    Maniate, Jerry
    Scowcroft, Katherine
    Buba, Melanie
    Rangel, J. Cristian
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 57 (04) : 337 - 348
  • [3] Factors Influencing Consumer Adoption of Electronic Health Records
    Mathai, Neethu
    McGill, Tanya
    Toohey, Danny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 62 (02) : 267 - 277
  • [4] Experiences from using patient accessible electronic health records-a qualitative study within Sami mental health patients in Norway
    Fagerlund, Asbjorn Johansen
    Kristiansen, Eli
    Simonsen, Renathe Aspeli
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2022, 81 (01)
  • [5] Patients' access to their online electronic health records
    Pyper, C
    Amery, J
    Watson, M
    Crook, C
    Thomas, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2002, 8 : 103 - 105
  • [6] Evaluating Continuous Glucose Monitoring Documents in Electronic Health Records-A Comparative Study of Algorithmic Classification vs. Manual Review
    Zheng, Yaguang
    Iturrate, Eduardo
    Li, Lehan
    Wu, Bei
    Wylie-Rosett, Judith
    Small, William R.
    Zweig, Susan
    Fletcher, Jason
    Melkus, Gail D.
    Chen, Zhihao
    Johnson, Stephen B.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2024, 73
  • [7] Factors influencing the implementation of electronic records and information management A case study in military service in Malaysia
    Abdullah, Azlan Long
    Yusof, Zawiyah Mohammad
    Mokhtar, Umi Asma
    [J]. RECORDS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (01) : 81 - 99
  • [8] Factors influencing the quality of vital sign data in electronic health records: A qualitative study
    Stevenson, Jean E.
    Israelsson, Johan
    Petersson, Goran
    Bath, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (5-6) : 1276 - 1286
  • [9] Privacy in Electronic Health Records: A Comparative Study
    Nair, Jayakrishna
    Alshaikh, Moneer
    Culnane, Christopher
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 9925 - 9935
  • [10] Factors Influencing Family Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
    Xierali, Imam M.
    Phillips, Robert L., Jr.
    Green, Larry A.
    Bazemore, Andrew W.
    Puffer, James C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (04) : 388 - 393