From image-guided radiotherapy to dose-guided radiotherapy

被引:12
|
作者
Cazoulat, G. [1 ,2 ]
Lesaunier, M. [1 ,2 ]
Simon, A. [1 ,2 ]
Haigron, P. [1 ,2 ]
Acosta, O. [1 ,2 ]
Louvel, G. [3 ]
Lafond, C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chajon, E. [3 ]
Leseur, J. [3 ]
de Crevoisier, R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, U642, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Univ Rennes 1, LTSI, F-35000 Rennes, France
[3] Ctr Eugene Marquis, CS 44229, F-35042 Rennes, France
来源
CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE | 2011年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
Image-guided radiotherapy; Dose-guided radiotherapy; CONE-BEAM CT; RADIATION-THERAPY; PROSTATE-CANCER; MONTE-CARLO; IMRT; HEAD; TOMOTHERAPY; STRATEGIES; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.canrad.2011.05.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. - In case of tumour displacement, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) based on the use of cone beam CT (tomographie conique) allows replacing the tumour under the accelerator by rigid registration. Anatomical deformations require however replanning, involving an estimation of the cumulative dose, session after session. This is the objective of this study. Patients and methods. - Two examples of arc-intensity modulated radiotherapy are presented: a case of prostate cancer (total dose = 80 Gy) with tomographie conique (daily prostate registration) and one head and neck cancer (70 Gy). For the head and neck cancer, the patient had a weekly scanner allowing a dose distribution calculation. The cumulative dose was calculated per voxel on the planning CT after deformation of the dose distribution (with trilinear interpolation) following the transformation given by a non-rigid registration step (Demons registration method) from: either the tomographie conique (prostate), or the weekly CT. The cumulative dose was eventually compared with the planned dose. Results. - In cases of prostate irradiation, the "cumulative" dose corresponded to the planned dose to the prostate. At the last week of irradiation, it was above the planned dose for the rectum and bladder. The volume of rectal wall receiving more than 50 Gy (V50) was 20% at the planning and 26% at the end of treatment, increasing the risk of rectal toxicity (NTCP) of 14%. For the bladder wall, V50 were 73% and 82%, respectively. In head and neck, the "cumulative" dose to the parotid exceeded the planned dose (mean dose increasing from 46 Gy to 54 Gy) from the 5th week of irradiation on, suggesting the need for replanning within the first 5 weeks of radiotherapy. Conclusion. - The deformable registration estimates the cumulative dose delivered in the different anatomical structures. Validation on digital and physical phantoms is however required before clinical evaluation. (C) 2011 Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 698
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dose verification for image-guided radiotherapy
    Kapatoes, J
    Ruchala, K
    Olivera, G
    Forrest, L
    Turek, M
    Mackie, T
    Welsh, J
    Jaradat, H
    Balog, J
    Lu, W
    Jeraj, R
    Reckwerdt, P
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1418 - 1419
  • [2] Dose-guided radiotherapy for lung tumors
    Angelo Piermattei
    Andrea Fidanzio
    Savino Cilla
    Francesca Greco
    Luigi Azario
    Domenico Sabatino
    Mattia Grusio
    Mariella Cozzolino
    Vincenzo Fusco
    [J]. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2010, 48 : 79 - 86
  • [3] Dose-guided radiotherapy for lung tumors
    Piermattei, Angelo
    Fidanzio, Andrea
    Cilla, Savino
    Greco, Francesca
    Azario, Luigi
    Sabatino, Domenico
    Grusio, Mattia
    Cozzolino, Mariella
    Fusco, Vincenzo
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2010, 48 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [4] Image-guided radiotherapy
    de Crevoisier, R.
    Isambert, A.
    Lisbona, A.
    Bodez, V.
    Marguet, M.
    Lafay, F.
    Remonnay, R.
    Lagrange, J. -L.
    [J]. CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2007, 11 (6-7): : 296 - 304
  • [5] Image-guided radiotherapy
    de Crevoisier, R.
    Lafond, C.
    Mervoyer, A.
    Hulot, C.
    Jaksic, N.
    Bessieres, I
    Delpon, G.
    [J]. CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2022, 26 (1-2): : 34 - 49
  • [6] The IMPORT HIGH Image-guided Radiotherapy Study: A Model for Assessing Image-guided Radiotherapy
    Donovan, E. M.
    Harris, E. J.
    Mukesh, M. B.
    Haviland, J. S.
    Titley, J.
    Griffin, C.
    Coles, C. E.
    Evans, P. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [7] Image-guided and adaptive radiotherapy
    Louvel, G.
    Cazoulat, G.
    Chajon, E.
    Le Maitre, A.
    Simon, A.
    Henry, O.
    Bensadoun, R. J.
    de Crevoisier, R.
    [J]. CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2012, 16 (5-6): : 423 - 429
  • [8] The Future of Image-guided Radiotherapy
    Choudhury, A.
    Budgell, G.
    MacKay, R.
    Falk, S.
    Faivre-Finn, C.
    Dubec, M.
    van Herk, M.
    McWilliam, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 29 (10) : 662 - 666
  • [9] Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy
    Dirk Verellen
    Mark De Ridder
    Nadine Linthout
    Koen Tournel
    Guy Soete
    Guy Storme
    [J]. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2007, 7 : 949 - 960
  • [10] A review of image-guided radiotherapy
    Chen G.T.Y.
    Sharp G.C.
    Mori S.
    [J]. Radiological Physics and Technology, 2009, 2 (1) : 1 - 12