Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework

被引:98
|
作者
Alvarez, Inmaculada C. [1 ]
Barbero, Javier [1 ]
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres [2 ]
Zofio, Jose L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci LSE, London, England
关键词
international trade; gravity equation; institutional quality; public policy; TRANSPORT COSTS; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; INFRASTRUCTURE; DETERMINANTS; DISTANCE; GEOGRAPHY; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.010
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article examines the extent to which national institutional quality affects bilateral sectoral trade flows, as well as whether the conditioning role of institutions for trade has been waxing or waning with time. Based on a new trade theory framework, we derive a sectoral gravity equation, including novel variables corresponding to the exporter's labor competitiveness levels, along with importer's price indices and sectoral incomes, and analyze industry-specific bilateral trade flows of 186 countries for the period 1996-2012. We address potential endogeneity and econometric drawbacks by means of the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood estimation methods. The results indicate that both the institutional conditions at destination and the institutional distance between exporting and importing countries are relevant factors for bilateral trade. Moreover, the effect associated with institutional conditions at destination moderately increases over time. This is a robust outcome across economic sectors, with higher values for agriculture and raw materials than for manufacturing and services. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 87
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade, institutional quality and economic growth in Africa: does China and United States trade matter?
    Duodu, Emmanuel
    Kwarteng, Evans
    Tawiah, Thompson Ogajah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2024,
  • [2] Trade aid, institutional quality, and trade
    Maruta, Admasu Asfaw
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2019, 103 : 25 - 37
  • [3] Institutional quality and international trade
    Levchenko, Andrei A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2007, 74 (03): : 791 - 819
  • [4] Institutional quality as a barrier to trade
    Briggs, Kristie
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 20 (16) : 1453 - 1458
  • [5] Institutional quality and trade:: Which institutions?: which trade?
    Meon, Pierre-Guillaume
    Sekkat, Khalid
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2008, 46 (02) : 227 - 240
  • [6] Spatial spillovers in trade agreement memberships: Does institutional proximity matter?
    Liu, Renliang
    Stengos, Thanasis
    Sun, Yiguo
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 32 (03) : 1398 - 1433
  • [7] Institutional quality and trade in intermediate goods
    Hyun, Hea-Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, 2018, 22 (02) : 162 - 186
  • [8] Institutional quality and the effectiveness of aid for trade
    Tadesse, Bedassa
    Shukralla, Elias
    Fayissa, Bichaka
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (39) : 4233 - 4254
  • [9] Institutional quality and the gains from trade
    Borrmann, Axel
    Busse, Matthias
    Neuhaus, Silke
    [J]. KYKLOS, 2006, 59 (03) : 345 - 368
  • [10] Does Trade Pattern Enhance Institutional Quality? Comparison across Regions
    Chung, Kee Hoon
    Choi, Moon Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2022, 24 (06): : 557 - 582