Testing cosmology with cosmic sound waves

被引:34
|
作者
Corasaniti, Pier Stefano [1 ]
Melchiorri, Alessandro [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Diderot, Observ Paris, CNRS UMR 8102, LUTH, F-92195 Meudon, France
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Dipartimento Fis & Sez, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] CERN, Div Theory, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2008年 / 77卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.77.103507
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations have accurately determined the position of the first two peaks and dips in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature power spectrum. These encode information on the ratio of the distance to the last scattering surface to the sound horizon at decoupling. However prerecombination processes can contaminate this distance information. In order to assess the amplitude of these effects, we use the WMAP data and evaluate the relative differences of the CMB peak and dip multipoles. We find that the position of the first peak is largely displaced with respect to the expected position of the sound horizon scale at decoupling. In contrast, the relative spacings of the higher extrema are statistically consistent with those expected from perfect harmonic oscillations. This provides evidence for a scale dependent phase shift of the CMB oscillations which is caused by gravitational driving forces affecting the propagation of sound waves before recombination. By accounting for these effects we have performed a Markov Chain Monte Carlo likelihood analysis of the location of WMAP extrema to constrain, in combination with recent BAO data, a constant dark energy equation of state parameter w. For a flat universe we find a strong 2 sigma upper limit w < - 1.10, and including the Hubble Space Telescope prior, we obtain w < - 1.14, which is only marginally consistent with limits derived from the Supernova Legacy Survey sample. On the other hand, we infer larger limits for nonflat. cosmologies. From the full CMB likelihood analysis, we also estimate the values of the shift parameter R and the multipole l(a) of the acoustic horizon at decoupling for several cosmologies, to test their dependence on model assumptions. Although the analysis of the full CMB spectra should always be preferred, using the position of the CMB peaks and dips provides a simple and consistent method for combining CMB constraints with other data sets.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cosmic sound waves rule
    Eisenstein, Daniel J.
    Bennett, Charles L.
    [J]. PHYSICS TODAY, 2008, 61 (04) : 44 - 50
  • [2] Testing the standard model of cosmology with the SKA: the cosmic radio dipole
    Bengaly, C. A. P.
    Siewert, T. M.
    Schwarz, D. J.
    Maartens, R.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 486 (01) : 1350 - 1357
  • [3] London-Like Tensor Modes of Gravitational Waves in Cosmic String Cosmology
    Aravena-Plaza, Claudio
    Munoz, Victor
    Asenjo, Felipe A.
    [J]. GRAVITATION & COSMOLOGY, 2023, 29 (04): : 400 - 403
  • [4] London-Like Tensor Modes of Gravitational Waves in Cosmic String Cosmology
    Claudio Aravena-Plaza
    Víctor Muñoz
    Felipe A. Asenjo
    [J]. Gravitation and Cosmology, 2023, 29 : 400 - 403
  • [5] COSMIC DEFECT COSMOLOGY
    Tartaglia, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A, 2009, 24 (8-9): : 1620 - 1624
  • [6] Cosmic rays and cosmology
    Wibig, T
    Wolfendale, AW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A, 2005, 20 (29): : 6612 - 6620
  • [7] Cosmic Rays and Cosmology
    Wibig, Tadeus
    Wolfendale, Arnold
    [J]. EXOTIC NUCLEI AND NUCLEAR /PARTICLE ASTROPHYSICS (II), 2008, 972 : 321 - +
  • [8] Cosmic rays and cosmology
    Wibig, T.
    Wolfendale, A. W.
    [J]. Proceedings of the 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol 10, 2005, : 63 - 71
  • [9] Cosmology on a cosmic ring
    Niedermann, Florian
    Schneider, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, (03):
  • [10] Cosmic rays and cosmology
    Wibig, T
    Wolfendale, AW
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2004, 136 : 179 - 184