In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft

被引:9
|
作者
Takeuchi, Satoshi [1 ]
Rothrauff, Benjamin B. [1 ]
Taguchi, Masashi [1 ]
Kanto, Ryo [1 ]
Onishi, Kentaro [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Freddie H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kaufman Med Bldg,Suite 1011,3941 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
ACL reconstruction; Preoperative planning; Graft size measurement; MRI; Quadriceps tendon autograft; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; PATELLAR TENDON; HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT; GRAFT DIAMETER; FOOTPRINT SIZE; ACL FOOTPRINT; ANTERIOR; ALLOGRAFT; SEMITENDINOSUS; BONE;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-020-05993-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Preoperative assessment to determine the sizes of potential autografts is necessary for individualized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, no study has investigated the prediction of the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft based upon preoperative imaging. This study investigated the correlation between the intraoperative diameter of a QT autograft and in situ thickness or cross-sectional area (CSA) measured using preoperative MRI. Methods Thirty-one knees of 31 patients (mean age 20.9 +/- 5.0 years) who underwent individualized anatomic ACLR using all soft tissue QT autograft were included retrospectively. At 15 mm proximal to the superior pole of the patella, the maximum QT thickness was assessed in the sagittal plane and the CSA was assessed at the central 10 mm of the QT in the axial plane. The angle between the axial plane and a line perpendicular to the QT longitudinal axis was used to calculate an adjusted CSA using a cosine function. Intraoperatively, each QT autograft was harvested with 10 mm width and the diameter was measured using a graft sizing device. Results Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of all measurements using preoperative MRI were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.833-0.970). Significant correlations were observed between the thickness, CSA, or adjusted CSA, and the intraoperative diameter (R = 0.434, 0.607, and 0.540, respectively; P < 0.05). Conclusions The CSA correlated most strongly with the QT autograft diameter. For individualized anatomic ACLR, measuring in situ CSA can be useful for preoperative planning of appropriate graft choices prior to surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 749
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft
    Satoshi Takeuchi
    Benjamin B. Rothrauff
    Masashi Taguchi
    Ryo Kanto
    Kentaro Onishi
    Freddie H. Fu
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, 29 : 742 - 749
  • [2] Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Takeuchi, Satoshi
    Rothrauff, Benjamin B.
    Taguchi, Masashi
    Onishi, Kentaro
    Fu, Freddie H.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (01) : 52 - 60
  • [3] Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Satoshi Takeuchi
    Benjamin B. Rothrauff
    Masashi Taguchi
    Kentaro Onishi
    Freddie H. Fu
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 52 - 60
  • [4] Magnetic resonance imaging of the quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Christopher P. Emerson
    Jessica M. Bernstein
    Fong Nham
    Spencer Barnhill
    Michael G. Baraga
    Eric Bogner
    Jean Jose
    Skeletal Radiology, 2019, 48 : 1685 - 1696
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging of the quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Emerson, Christopher P.
    Bernstein, Jessica M.
    Nham, Fong
    Barnhill, Spencer
    Baraga, Michael G.
    Bogner, Eric
    Jose, Jean
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (11) : 1685 - 1696
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of the quadriceps tendon cross-sectional area as an adjunctive diagnostic parameter in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome
    Ni Jang, Jae
    Park, Soyoon
    Park, Sukhee
    Song, Yumin
    Kim, Jae Won
    Kang, Keum Nae
    Kim, Young Uk
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 34 (03): : 565 - 570
  • [7] Correlation between semitendinosus and gracilis tendon cross-sectional area determined using ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative tendon measurements
    Galanis, Nikiforos
    Savvidis, Matthaios
    Tsifountoudis, Ioannis
    Gkouvas, George
    Alafropatis, Ilias
    Kirkos, John
    Kellis, Eleftherios
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2016, 26 : 44 - 51
  • [8] Prediction of quadriceps tendon–patellar bone autograft diameter in adolescents with 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric measures
    Alexia G. Gagliardi
    David R. Howell
    Jill M. Stein
    Matthew A. Monson
    Stephanie S. Pearce
    Jay C. Albright
    Skeletal Radiology, 2022, 51 : 619 - 623
  • [9] Prediction of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft diameter in adolescents with 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric measures
    Gagliardi, Alexia G.
    Howell, David R.
    Stein, Jill M.
    Monson, Matthew A.
    Pearce, Stephanie S.
    Albright, Jay C.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (03) : 619 - 623
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Predict Hamstring or Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Diameter in Pediatric or Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Vivekanantha, Prushoth
    Sun, Bryan
    Parasu, Naveen
    de Sa, Darren
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 45 (02) : e112 - e118