Cartesian Genetic Programming as an Optimizer of Programs Evolved with Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming

被引:2
|
作者
Koncal, Ondrej [1 ]
Sekanina, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Brno Univ Technol, IT4Innovat Ctr Excellence, Fac Informat Technol, Bozetechova 2, Brno 61266, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
Cartesian Genetic Programming; Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming; Symbolic regression;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-16670-0_7
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming (GSGP), genetic operators directly work at the level of semantics rather than syntax. It provides many advantages, including much higher quality of resulting individuals (in terms of error) in comparison with a common genetic programming. However, GSGP produces extremely huge solutions that could be difficult to apply in systems with limited resources such as embedded systems. We propose Subtree Cartesian Genetic Programming (SCGP) - a method capable of reducing the number of nodes in the trees generated by GSGP. SCGP executes a common Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) on all elementary subtrees created by GSGP and on various compositions of these optimized subtrees in order to create one compact representation of the original program. SCGP does not guarantee the (exact) semantic equivalence between the CGP individuals and the GSGP subtrees, but the user can define conditions when a particular CGP individual is acceptable. We evaluated SCGP on four common symbolic regression benchmark problems and the obtained node reduction is from 92.4% to 99.9%.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 113
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming for Recursive Boolean Programs
    Moraglio, Alberto
    Krawiec, Krzysztof
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'17), 2017, : 993 - 1000
  • [2] Geometric semantic genetic programming with normalized and standardized random programs
    Bakurov, Illya
    Munoz Contreras, Jose Manuel
    Castelli, Mauro
    Rodrigues, Nuno
    Silva, Sara
    Trujillo, Leonardo
    Vanneschi, Leonardo
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND EVOLVABLE MACHINES, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [3] Cartesian Genetic Programming as Local Optimizer of Logic Networks
    Sekanina, Lukas
    Ptak, Ondrej
    Vasicek, Zdenek
    [J]. 2014 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2014, : 2901 - 2908
  • [4] Cellular geometric semantic genetic programming
    Bonin, Lorenzo
    Rovito, Luigi
    De Lorenzo, Andrea
    Manzoni, Luca
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND EVOLVABLE MACHINES, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [5] Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming Is Overkill
    Pawlak, Tomasz P.
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING, EUROGP 2016, 2016, 9594 : 246 - 260
  • [6] An Introduction to Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming
    Vanneschi, Leonardo
    [J]. NEO 2015, 2017, 663 : 3 - 42
  • [7] A comparison of Cartesian Genetic Programming and Linear Genetic Programming
    Wilson, Garnett
    Banzhaf, Wolfgang
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 4971 : 182 - 193
  • [8] Cartesian genetic programming
    Miller, JF
    Thomson, P
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 1802 : 121 - 132
  • [9] Instance Selection for Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming
    Miranda, Luis Fernando
    Oliveira, Luiz Otavio V. B.
    Martins, Joao Francisco B. S.
    Pappa, Gisele L.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2020,
  • [10] On the Generalization Ability of Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming
    Goncalves, Ivo
    Silva, Sara
    Fonseca, Carlos M.
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING (EUROGP 2015), 2015, 9025 : 41 - 52