Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the patient reported experience measure for addiction treatment (PREMAT)

被引:5
|
作者
Kelly, Peter J. [1 ,2 ]
Hatton, Emma L. [1 ]
Hinsley, Kate [1 ]
Davis, Esther [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larance, Briony [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Psychol, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Illawarra Hlth & Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, Australian Hlth Serv Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
Residential rehabilitation; Alcohol; Substance dependence; Satisfaction; Quality improvement; Treatment experience; Therapeutic community; CLIENT SATISFACTION; PEOPLE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; ALCOHOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107048
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are recommended for use in evaluating person centred care. To date, a PREM has not been validated for residential alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment. Utilising items developed through a previously published qualitative study informing the development of the PREM for Addiction Treatment (PREMAT), the current study conducted a psychometric evaluation and validation of the PREMAT. Design and methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from six Australian residential AOD treatment facilities (N = 178). Psychometric evaluation included examining the factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity of the PREMAT. Test re-test reliability was conducted at one treatment site (n = 24). Results: The total PREMAT score demonstrated strong internal consistency (alpha = 0.91). Principle components analysis identified six factors (all alpha > 0.72). The PREMAT total score and factor scores were negatively skewed. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by strong positive correlations with measures of satisfaction (rho = 0.81, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8; rho = 0.78, Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire), and divergent validity was demonstrated with weaker correlations with Drug-Taking Confidence Questionnaire (rho = 0.25) and Kessler-10 (rho =-0.20). Test-retest reliability was strong for the total PREMAT (rho = 0.89). Discussion and conclusions: Results support the use of the PREMAT as a valid measure of experience in residential AOD treatment settings. Future research should examine the use of the PREMAT across the course of treatment to examine if experience is related to client characteristics, outcome, dropout or re-engagement in treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the patient-reported experience measure for addiction treatment (PREMAT-NL)
    Migchels, Charlotte
    van den Brink, Wim
    Zerrouk, Amine
    Matthys, Frieda
    De Ruysscher, Clara
    Vanderplasschen, Wouter
    Crunelle, Cleo L.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2024, 43 (07) : 2021 - 2034
  • [2] DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF A PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE FOR LUNG CANCER STIGMA
    Hamann, Heidi
    Shen, Megan
    Thomas, Anna
    Lee, Simon
    Ostroff, Jamie
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S734 - S735
  • [3] Further psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported outcome measure: patient-reported experience of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia (PRECIS)
    Hastedt, C.
    Podhorna, J.
    Sidovar, M.
    Sommer, S.
    Atkinson, M.
    Shaffer, S.
    Lenderking, W.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 40 : S247 - S247
  • [4] Psychometric evaluation of patient-reported experience measures: is it valid?
    Sizmur, Steve
    Graham, Chris
    Bos, Nanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 32 (03) : 219 - 220
  • [5] PRECiS (Patient Reported Evaluation of Cognitive State): psychometric evaluation of a new patient reported outcome measure of the impact of stroke
    Patchick, Emma
    Vail, Andy
    Wood, Alison
    Bowen, Audrey
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 30 (12) : 1229 - 1241
  • [6] The Sarcoma Assessment Measure (SAM): Preliminary Psychometric Validation of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
    Hulbert-Williams, Lee
    Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J.
    Martins, Ana
    Storey, Lesley
    Bradley, Jennie
    O'Sullivan, Hatty
    Fern, Lorna A.
    Lawal, Maria
    Windsor, Rachael
    Gerrand, Craig
    Whelan, Jeremy S.
    Bennister, Lindsey
    Wells, Mary
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [7] Psychometric evaluation of an experience sampling method-based patient-reported outcome measure in functional dyspepsia
    Klaassen, Tim
    Smeets, Fabienne G. M.
    Vork, Lisa
    Tack, Jan
    Talley, Nicholas J.
    Simren, Magnus
    Aziz, Qasim
    Ford, Alexander C.
    Kruimel, Joanna W.
    Conchillo, Jose M.
    Leue, Carsten
    Masclee, Adrian A. M.
    Keszthelyi, Daniel
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33 (09):
  • [8] Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported outcome measure in pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI)
    Johnson, Colin D.
    Williamson, Nicola
    Janssen-van Solingen, Gwendolyn
    Arbuckle, Rob
    Johnson, Chloe
    Simpson, Sarah
    Staab, Doris
    Dominguez-Munoz, Enrique
    Levy, Phillippe
    Connett, Gary
    Lerch, Markus M.
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01) : 182 - 190
  • [9] PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF NASH-CHECK, A PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE FOR NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS
    Twiss, J.
    Whalley, D.
    Doward, L.
    Balp, M. M.
    Brass, C.
    Lopez, P.
    Loeffler, J.
    Cai, J.
    Cryer, D.
    Sanyal, A. J.
    Anstee, Q. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S625 - S625
  • [10] Stroke Social Network Scale: development and psychometric evaluation of a new patient-reported measure
    Northcott, Sarah
    Hilari, Katerina
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2013, 27 (09) : 823 - 833