Measures for assessing practice change in medical practitioners

被引:34
|
作者
Hakkennes, Sharon [1 ]
Green, Sally [2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Physiotherapy, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Inst Hlth Serv Res, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Implementation Strategy; Health Practitioner; Patient Change; Practitioner Behaviour; Encounter Form;
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-1-29
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There are increasing numbers of randomised trials and systematic reviews examining the efficacy of interventions designed to bring about a change in clinical practice. The findings of this research are being used to guide strategies to increase the uptake of evidence into clinical practice. Knowledge of the outcomes measured by these trials is vital not only for the interpretation and application of the work done to date, but also to inform future research in this expanding area of endeavour and to assist in collation of results in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: The objective of this review was to identify methods used to measure change in the clinical practices of health professionals following an intervention aimed at increasing the uptake of evidence into practice. All published trials included in a recent, comprehensive Health Technology Assessment of interventions to implement clinical practice guidelines and change clinical practice (n = 228) formed the sample for this study. Using a standardised data extraction form, one reviewer (SH), extracted the relevant information from the methods and/or results sections of the trials. Results: Measures of a change of health practitioner behaviour were the most common, with 88.8% of trials using these as outcome measures. Measures that assessed change at a patient level, either actual measures of change or surrogate measures of change, were used in 28.8% and 36.7% of studies (respectively). Health practitioners' knowledge and attitudes were assessed in 22.8% of the studies and changes at an organisational level were assessed in 17.6%. Conclusion: Most trials of interventions aimed at changing clinical practice measured the effect of the intervention at the level of the practitioner, i.e. did the practitioner change what they do, or has their knowledge of and/or attitude toward that practice changed? Less than one-third of the trials measured, whether or not any change in practice, resulted in a change in the ultimate end-point of patient health status.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measures for assessing practice change in medical practitioners
    Sharon Hakkennes
    Sally Green
    Implementation Science, 1
  • [2] Change in Medical Practice
    Chan, G. C. F.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS, 2014, 19 (04) : 223 - 224
  • [3] Measures for assessing parenting in research and practice
    Smith, Marjorie
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH, 2011, 16 (03) : 158 - 166
  • [4] Promoting change in medical practice
    Miller, Adam
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 185 (03) : E147 - E148
  • [5] Use of placebo: Knowledge, attitude and practice in medical practitioners
    Shah, K. N.
    Vyas, B. M.
    Panchal, D. J.
    Patel, V. J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 40 : 188 - 188
  • [6] Continuing medical education for general practitioners: a practice format
    VanNieuwenborg, Lena
    Goossens, Martine
    De Lepeleire, Jan
    Schoenmakers, Birgitte
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 92 (1086) : 217 - 222
  • [7] Assessing workplace discrimination among medical practitioners in Western Sydney
    Agrawal, Ravindra
    Foresti, Katia
    Rajadurai, Jeremy
    Zubaran, Carlos
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 26 (05) : 491 - 495
  • [8] THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ECONOMIC-MEASURES
    FEDORENKO, N
    SHATALIN, S
    LVOV, D
    PETRAKOV, N
    PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 27 (05): : 3 - 22
  • [10] Attitude of medical students towards general practice and general practitioners
    Henderson, E
    Berlin, A
    Fuller, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2002, 52 (478): : 359 - 363