Student and Faculty Perceptions of E-Feedback

被引:11
|
作者
McCabe, Jennifer [1 ]
Doerflinger, Alicia [2 ]
Fox, Russell [2 ]
机构
[1] Goucher Coll, Dept Psychol, Baltimore, MD 21204 USA
[2] Marietta Coll, Marietta, OH USA
关键词
educational technology; writing skills; grading (educational); feedback; college students;
D O I
10.1177/0098628311411794
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article presents student and faculty ratings of electronic editing (EE) functions (i.e., track changes, insert comments, highlighting) as used for e-feedback on written assignments. Students reported increased convenience, clarity of expectations, amount of feedback, and writing ability as well as substantial improvement in EE skills compared to paper-based methods. Also, ratings and use of e-feedback were positively correlated with final report grades. To further explore the role of e-feedback in psychology education, a survey indicated that faculty rated e-feedback as similar to paper-based methods for time and effort but potentially more beneficial for learning. In addition, faculty with more e-feedback experience reported higher educational value for EE skills. Advantages and disadvantages from the student and instructor perspectives are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 179
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Briefly Review of E-Feedback
    Zhang, Min
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT, LAW AND EDUCATION, 2016, 46 : 452 - 455
  • [2] Personalized e-Feedback and ICT
    Martinez-Argueelles, Maria-Jesus
    Batalla-Busquets, Josep-Maria
    Noguera-Guerra, Patricia
    Pons-Fanals, Ernest
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 456 - 464
  • [3] Robots as Faculty: Student and Faculty Perceptions
    Sampsel, Debi
    Bharwani, Govind
    Mehling, Diane
    Smith, Sherrill
    [J]. CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2011, 7 (06) : E209 - E218
  • [4] Formative feedback to students: the mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations
    Perera, Jennifer
    Lee, Nagarajah
    Win, Khin
    Perera, Joachim
    Wijesuriya, Lionel
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2008, 30 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [5] Student perceptions of faculty feedback following medication errors - A descriptive study
    Walsh, Lorna J.
    Anstey, Allan J.
    Tracey, Anne Marie
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2018, 33 : 10 - 16
  • [6] Innovative Practices in Instructor E-feedback: A Case Study of E-feedback given in Three Linguistic Courses during the COVID 19 Pandemic
    AbuSa'aleek, Atef O.
    Shariq, Mohammad
    [J]. ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2021, : 183 - 198
  • [7] E-feedback intersections and disconnections in the interests of designers and users
    Dexter, Sara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTINUING ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND LIFE-LONG LEARNING, 2010, 20 (02) : 169 - 188
  • [8] PERSONALIZED E-FEEDBACK AND INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT)
    Badia-Miro, M.
    Hintzmann, C.
    Martinez-Argueelles, M. J.
    Plana-Erta, D.
    [J]. EDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, : 6426 - 6435
  • [9] Pen&Paper, or e-Feedback: Comparative Study
    Simonova, Ivana
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WEB-BASED LEARNING, (ICWL 2016), 2016, 10013 : 273 - 280
  • [10] Student and Faculty Perceptions on Feedback in a Graduate Social Work Distance Education Program
    McCarthy, Katherine M.
    Wilkerson, David
    Ashirifi, Gifty
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 42 (04) : 392 - 408