Expectations and voting in the NCAA football polls - The wisdom of point spread markets

被引:13
|
作者
Paul, Rodney J. [1 ]
Weinbach, Andrew P.
Coate, Patrick
机构
[1] St Bonaventure Univ, Dept Finance, St Bonaventure, NY 14778 USA
[2] Coastal Carolina Univ, Conway, SC 29528 USA
[3] Univ Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
efficient markets; sports; voting;
D O I
10.1177/1527002506287696
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A week-to-week voting model for college football using voting points from the ESPN/USA Today and Associated Press polls is specified. The point spread differential, the score differential of the most recent game minus the point spread, is shown to have a positive and highly significant effect on votes in both polls. A team that covers the point spread will receive an increase in votes in both polls. A team that wins but does not cover the point spread will lose votes. This result shows the role of expectations in this market. If a team performs better than expected, it will receive more votes in the polls and possibly move up in the rankings. Television coverage is also examined, and voter reaction to team performance is found to be greater for those games that are televised, which could be due to the television exposure itself or the fact that televised coverage is a proxy for important games.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 424
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Point shaving: Corruption in NCAA college football?
    Schmidt, Martin B.
    Stuck, Lee M.
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2009, 105 (01) : 90 - 92
  • [2] Understanding Price Movements in Point-Spread Betting Markets: Evidence from NCAA Basketball
    Brad R Humphreys
    Rodney J Paul
    Andrew Weinbach
    [J]. Eastern Economic Journal, 2014, 40 (4) : 518 - 534
  • [3] Understanding Price Movements in Point-Spread Betting Markets: Evidence from NCAA Basketball
    Humphreys, Brad R.
    Paul, Rodney J.
    Weinbach, Andrew
    [J]. EASTERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2014, 40 (04) : 518 - 534
  • [4] Performance expectations and the tenure of head coaches: Evidence from NCAA football
    Humphreys, Brad R.
    Paul, Rodney J.
    Weinbach, Andrew P.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS, 2016, 70 (03) : 482 - 492
  • [5] Distilling the Wisdom of Crowds: Prediction Markets vs. Prediction Polls
    Atanasov, Pavel
    Rescober, Phillip
    Stone, Eric
    Swift, Samuel A.
    Servan-Schreiber, Emile
    Tetlock, Philip
    Ungar, Lyle
    Mellers, Barbara
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (03) : 691 - 706
  • [6] NCAA football television viewership: Product quality and consumer preference relative to market expectations
    Brown, Katie M.
    Salaga, Steven
    [J]. SPORT MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2018, 21 (04) : 377 - 390
  • [7] Testing for home team and favorite biases in the Australian rules football fixed-odds and point spread betting markets
    Schnytzer, Adi
    Weinberg, Guy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS ECONOMICS, 2008, 9 (02) : 173 - 190
  • [8] Improved NCAA basketball tournament modeling via point spread and team strength information
    Carlin, BP
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1996, 50 (01): : 39 - 43
  • [9] Point-Spread Wagering Markets' Analogue to Realized Return in Financial Markets
    Durham, Greg
    Santhanakrishnan, Mukunthan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS ECONOMICS, 2012, 13 (05) : 554 - 566
  • [10] Is herding efficient? Evidence from the college football point spread market
    Traugutt, Alexander
    Morton, Jarid
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2022, 42 (03):