Standards? Whose standards?

被引:10
|
作者
Cass, Noel [1 ]
Shove, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Demand Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YD, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Standards; market; offices; design; energy; buildings; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; OFFICE BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1080/00038628.2018.1502158
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Building standards, regulations and labelling schemes are instruments for reducing energy demand and carbon emissions, linking policy ambitions to market-based responses. In practice, their effects are complicated. In this paper we show how market standards' in the office sector are fostering escalating energy demand and favouring building designs increasingly disconnected from changing user needs. In black boxing' ideas about needs, standards powerfully and dangerously stabilize, and often escalate, concepts of normal' provision. Far from being neutral, standards are operating amid competing interests and ambitions in the market place. Processes of black-boxing, locking-in, ratcheting, reification, circulation and disconnection (the dark sides' of standards in action) are investigated to explore how they might be avoided. The paper provides insight into the role that market standards play in energy demand in the non-domestic (office) sector, through an examination of ten case studies of speculative office developments in London.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条