Collaborative Double Robust Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation

被引:86
|
作者
van der Laan, Mark J. [1 ]
Gruber, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
关键词
asymptotic linearity; coarsening at random; causal effect; censored data; cross-validation; collaborative double robust; double robust; efficient influence curve; estimating function; estimator selection; influence curve; G-computation; locally efficient; loss-function; marginal structural model; maximum likelihood estimation; model selection; pathwise derivative; semiparametric model; sieve; super efficiency; super-learning; targeted maximum likelihood estimation; targeted nuisance parameter estimator selection; variable importance; DEMYSTIFYING DOUBLE ROBUSTNESS; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES; CAUSAL INFERENCE;
D O I
10.2202/1557-4679.1181
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimators represent a fundamental further advance over standard targeted maximum likelihood estimators of a pathwise differentiable parameter of a data generating distribution in a semiparametric model, introduced in van der Laan, Rubin (2006). The targeted maximum likelihood approach involves fluctuating an initial estimate of a relevant factor (Q) of the density of the observed data, in order to make a bias/variance tradeoff targeted towards the parameter of interest. The fluctuation involves estimation of a nuisance parameter portion of the likelihood, g. TMLE has been shown to be consistent and asymptotically normally distributed (CAN) under regularity conditions, when either one of these two factors of the likelihood of the data is correctly specified, and it is semiparametric efficient if both are correctly specified. In this article we provide a template for applying collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation (C-TMLE) to the estimation of pathwise differentiable parameters in semi-parametric models. The procedure creates a sequence of candidate targeted maximum likelihood estimators based on an initial estimate for Q coupled with a succession of increasingly non-parametric estimates for g. In a departure from current state of the art nuisance parameter estimation, C-TMLE estimates of g are constructed based on a loss function for the targeted maximum likelihood estimator of the relevant factor Q that uses the nuisance parameter to carry out the fluctuation, instead of a loss function for the nuisance parameter itself. Likelihood-based cross-validation is used to select the best estimator among all candidate TMLE estimators of Q(0) in this sequence. A penalized-likelihood loss function for Q is suggested when the parameter of interest is borderline-identifiable. We present theoretical results for "collaborative double robustness," demonstrating that the collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimator is CAN even when Q and g are both misspecified, providing that g solves a specified score equation implied by the difference between the Q and the true Q(0). This marks an improvement over the current definition of double robustness in the estimating equation literature. We also establish an asymptotic linearity theorem for the C-DR-TMLE of the target parameter, showing that the C-DR-TMLE is more adaptive to the truth, and, as a consequence, can even be super efficient if the first stage density estimator does an excellent job itself with respect to the target parameter. This research provides a template for targeted efficient and robust loss-based learning of a particular target feature of the probability distribution of the data within large (infinite dimensional) semi-parametric models, while still providing statistical inference in terms of confidence intervals and p-values. This research also breaks with a taboo (e.g., in the propensity score literature in the field of causal inference) on using the relevant part of likelihood to fine-tune the fitting of the nuisance parameter/censoring mechanism/treatment mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:71
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Application of Collaborative Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Causal Inference and Genomics
    Gruber, Susan
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (01):
  • [2] Robust Maximum Likelihood Estimation
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Nohadani, Omid
    INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2019, 31 (03) : 445 - 458
  • [3] Collaborative Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation to Assess Causal Effects in Observational Studies
    Gruber, Susan
    van der Laan, Mark
    BIOPHARMACEUTICAL APPLIED STATISTICS SYMPOSIUM: BIOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL TRIALS, VOL 2, 2018, : 1 - 23
  • [4] Collaborative Targeted Maximum Likelihood for Time to Event Data
    Stitelman, Ori M.
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (01):
  • [5] Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research
    Pang, Menglan
    Schuster, Tibor
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Eberg, Maria
    Platt, Robert W.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (04) : 570 - 577
  • [6] Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Prediction Calibration
    Brooks, Jordan
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    Go, Alan S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2012, 8 (01):
  • [7] Application of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Pharmacoepidemiology
    Pang, Menglan
    Schuster, Tibor
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Eberg, Maria
    Platt, Robert W.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 207 - 208
  • [8] Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis
    Lendle, Samuel D.
    Fireman, Bruce
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (08) : S91 - S98
  • [9] Robust estimation of the variogram by residual maximum likelihood
    Marchant, B. P.
    Lark, R. M.
    GEODERMA, 2007, 140 (1-2) : 62 - 72
  • [10] Robust maximum likelihood estimation in the linear model
    Calafiore, G
    El Ghaoui, L
    AUTOMATICA, 2001, 37 (04) : 573 - 580