Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes

被引:0
|
作者
Wainwright, PC [1 ]
Ferry-Graham, LA [1 ]
Waltzek, TB [1 ]
Carroll, AM [1 ]
Hulsey, CD [1 ]
Grubich, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sect Evolut & Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY | 2001年 / 204卷 / 17期
关键词
ram-suction; index; prey capture; feeding; cichlid; feeding performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We characterized prey-capture strategies in seven species of cichlid fishes representing diverse trophic habits and anticipated feeding abilities. The species examined were Petenia splendida, Cichla ocellaris, Cichlasoma minckleyi, Astronotus ocellatus, Crenicichla geayi, Heros severus (formerly Cichlasoma severum) and Cyprichromis leptosoma. Three individuals per species were filmed with video at 500 Hz as they captured live adult Artemia sp. and Poecilia reticulata. For each feeding sequence, we measured the contribution of predator movement towards the prey (i.e. ram) and the movement of prey towards the predator due to suction. The use of ram differed significantly among prey types and predator species, varying as much as sixfold across predator species. High values of ram resulted in high attack velocities. Jaw protrusion contributed as much as 50 % to overall ram values in some species, verifying its role in enhancing attack velocity. Suction distance did not vary significantly among species. Diversity in prey-capture behavior was therefore found to reflect differences among species in the strategy used to approach prey. Limited variation in the distance from which prey were sucked into the mouth is interpreted as the result of an expected exponential decline in water velocity with distance from the mouth of the suction-feeding predator. We propose that this relationship represents a major constraint on the distance over which suction feeding is effective for all aquatic-feeding predators.
引用
收藏
页码:3039 / 3051
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modulation of prey capture in ram, suction, and biting centrarchid species
    Durie, CJ
    Wilga, CD
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (06) : 692 - 692
  • [2] Suction, Ram, and Biting: Deviations and Limitations to the Capture of Aquatic Prey
    Ferry, Lara A.
    Paig-Tran, E. Misty
    Gibb, Alice C.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 55 (01) : 97 - 109
  • [3] Larval fish counteract ram and suction to capture evasive prey
    Chang, Irvin
    Hartline, Daniel K.
    Lenz, Petra H. H.
    Takagi, Daisuke
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (11):
  • [4] Feeding in serrasalmine fishes: a comparison of suction and biting prey capture.
    Janovetz, J
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 2000, 40 (06): : 1074 - 1074
  • [5] A comparison of prey capture behavior and kinematics in three ram feeding fishes.
    Porter, HT
    Motta, PJ
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 2000, 40 (06): : 1175 - 1175
  • [6] Does Xenopus laevis use suction for prey capture?
    Carreno, CA
    Nishikawa, KC
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) : 980 - 980
  • [7] Beyond Suction-Feeding Fishes: Diverse Strategies for Integrating Functional Systems During Prey Capture in Vertebrates
    Kane, E. A.
    Cohen, H. E.
    Marshall, C. D.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 59 : E118 - E118
  • [8] Aquatic feeding in pipid frogs: the use of suction for prey capture
    Carreno, Carrie A.
    Nishikawa, Kiisa C.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 213 (12): : 2001 - 2008
  • [9] NOVEL SUCTION FEEDING KINEMATICS RESULTS IN AN UNUSUAL FORM OF PREY CAPTURE IN SYNGNATHIFORM FISHES
    Longo, S. J.
    Wainwright, P. C.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 55 : E114 - E114
  • [10] Beyond Suction-Feeding Fishes: Identifying New Approaches to Performance Integration During Prey Capture in Aquatic Vertebrates
    Kane, Emily A.
    Cohen, Hannah E.
    Hicks, William R.
    Mahoney, Emily R.
    Marshall, Christopher D.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 59 (02) : 456 - 472