Incidence and risk factors of lateral cage migration occurred after the first-stage lateral lumbar interbody fusion surgery

被引:7
|
作者
Li, Hao [1 ]
Xu, Zheng Kuan [1 ]
Zhang, Ning [1 ]
Li, Fangcai [1 ]
Chen, Qixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Jiefang Rd 88, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Spinal fusion; Lumbar vertebrae; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Complication; SUBSIDENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103033
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a novel, minimally invasive technique for the surgical treatment of lumbar diseases. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors of lateral cage migration (LCM) occurred after the first-stage LLIF. Hypothesis: The hypothesis was that LCM occurred after the first-stage LLIF was associated with some demographic characteristics, surgical variables and radiographic parameters. Patients and methods: Between June 2016 and August 2020, 335 patients (901 levels) underwent staged LLIF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into LCM and non-LCM group based on the experience of LCM before the second-stage posterior instrumentation. 100 patients in non-LCM were randomly sampled as a control group. Incidence of LCM was determined; demographic characteristics, surgical variables and radiographic parameters associated with LCM were compared between the LCM and control group. Univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors. Results: LCM occurred after the first-stage LLIF was found in 19 (5.7%) patients. Bony endplate injury (OR, 106.255; 95% CI, 1.265-8924.765; p = 0.039) and greater preoperative range of motion (ROM) (OR, 2.083, 95% CI, 1.068-4.066, p = 0.031) were high risk factors for LCM. LCM occurred mainly 3 days later after the first-stage LLIF, while 4 cases experienced severe neural symptoms, intolerable low back pain and finally underwent reoperation. Discussion: LCM occurred after the first-stage LLIF was significantly associated with bony endplate injury and greater preoperative ROM. Second-stage posterior fixation should be performed as soon as possible or a supplement lateral fixation/self-locking cage should be used in high-risk patients. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Factors for Posterior Cage Migration after Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery
    Lee, Dong-Yeong
    Park, Young-Jin
    Song, Sang-Youn
    Jeong, Soon-Taek
    Kim, Dong-Hee
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [2] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [3] Multivariate Analysis on Risk Factors for Postoperative Ileus After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Al Maaieh, Motasem A.
    Du, Jerry Y.
    Aichmair, Alexander
    Huang, Russel C.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (08) : 688 - 694
  • [4] Risk factors for cage migration and cage retropulsion following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Park, Man-Kyu
    Kim, Kyoung-Tae
    Bang, Woo-Seok
    Cho, Dae-Chul
    Sung, Joo-Kyung
    Lee, Young-Seok
    Lee, Chang Kyu
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Kwon, Brian K.
    Lee, Won-Kee
    Han, Inbo
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (03): : 437 - 447
  • [5] Risk Factors for Cage Migration Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined With Posterior Instrumentation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 983 Cases
    Kimura, Hiroaki
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Murata, Koichi
    Takemoto, Mitsuru
    Odate, Seiichi
    Shikata, Jitsuhiko
    Sakamoto, Takeshi
    Tsutsumi, Ryosuke
    Ota, Masato
    Kitaori, Toshiyuki
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (24) : 1741 - 1748
  • [6] Risk of sympathectomy after anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures
    Hrabalek, Lumir
    Sternbersky, Jan
    Adamus, Milan
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2015, 159 (02): : 318 - 326
  • [7] Risk Factors Associated with Cage Retropulsion After Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Zhang, Mingyan
    Liu, Xiangyang
    Wang, Guohua
    Liu, Hongzhe
    Zhu, Feng
    Mou, Haipin
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 34 (02) : 274 - 282
  • [8] Subsidence of Interbody Cage Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: An Analysis and Potential Risk Factors
    Kotheeranurak, Vit
    Jitpakdee, Khanathip
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Mahatthanatrakul, Akaworn
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (07) : 1981 - 1991
  • [9] Analysis of the Factors Affecting Lumbar Segmental Lordosis After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Takemoto, Mitsuru
    Kimura, Hiroaki
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Murata, Koichi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (14) : E839 - E846
  • [10] Changes in Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Different Lordotic Cage Angulations
    Bakare, Adewale A.
    Fessler, David R.
    Wewel, Joshua T.
    Fontes, Ricardo B., V
    Fessler, Richard G.
    O'Toole, John E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (03): : 440 - 448