The impacts of the single -use of different lime materials on the pond bottom soil with acid sulfate content

被引:6
|
作者
Fitrani, Mirna [1 ,2 ]
Wudtisin, Idsariya [1 ]
Kaewnern, Methee [1 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Fisheries, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Sriwijaya Univ, Fac Agr, South Sumatera, Indonesia
关键词
MANAGEMENT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735471
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
The strong acidity of water and soil in areas containing sulfate is the issue in aquaculture. This research aimed to investigate the influence of each liming material with different dosages to minimise the acidity effects in soil with acid sulfate content and to enhance water alkalinity. Dolomite (Ca Mg(CO3)2); (DA)50, (DB)10, and (DC) 5 ton/Ha), hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2); (HA) 2300, (HB) 1500, and (HC) 1300 Kg/Ha, as well as burnt lime (CaO); (OA) 260, (OB) 210, and (OC) 150 Kg/Ha were applied. Results indicated that each liming material affected the increase of pH in the sediment and water, alkalinity, as well as the decomposition of organic carbon. The highest dosage used in dolomite (DA), hydrated lime (HA), and burnt lime (OA) resulted in the highest pH level for soil and water, as well as alkalinity. The lowest amount of organic carbon was also recorded. Further analysis showed a high concentration of total calcium and magnesium and a decrease of acid-forming cations. An enormous amount of dolomite was needed, unlike burnt lime and hydrated lime treatments, to achieve the desired alkalinity and pH for both soil and water. Consequently, higher expenditure will probably be incurred in the extensive use of dolomite. Nevertheless, based on the results of soil and water properties, the application of hydrated lime (HA) tend to be more reliable in terms of effectiveness to minimise the problem in acid sulfate area. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of different shrimp pond bottom soil treatments on the change of physical characteristics and pathogenic bacteria in pond bottom soil
    Nimrat, Subuntith
    Suksawat, Sunisa
    Maleeweach, Pongsiri
    Vuthiphandchai, Verapong
    AQUACULTURE, 2008, 285 (1-4) : 123 - 129
  • [2] Climate change impacts on acid sulfate soil landscapes
    Bush, R. T.
    Sullivan, L. A.
    Burton, E. D.
    Johnston, S. G.
    Keene, A. F.
    Wong, V.
    Mosley, L.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2010, 74 (12) : A132 - A132
  • [3] AN INFRARED METHOD FOR RAPID ANALYSIS OF SULFATE CONTENT OF REACTED LIME AND LIMESTONE MATERIALS
    RISSMANN, EF
    LARKIN, RL
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1970, 42 (13) : 1628 - &
  • [4] Effect of different types of organic materials and lime on soil aggregation
    Browning, GM
    Milam, FM
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1944, 57 (01) : 91 - 106
  • [5] AN INFRARED METHOD FOR RAPID ANALYSIS OF SULFATE CONTENT OF REACTED LIME AND LIMESTONE MATERIALS - ANAL
    RISSMANN, EF
    LARKIN, RL
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1970, : 39 - &
  • [6] Variations in stable sulfur isotopes in acid sulfate soil materials
    Maher, Crystal A.
    Sullivan, Leigh A.
    Bush, Richard T.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 71 (15) : A612 - A612
  • [7] The process of sulfide oxidation in some acid sulfate soil materials
    Ward, NJ
    Sullivan, LA
    Fyfe, DM
    Bush, RT
    Ferguson, AJP
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (04): : 449 - 458
  • [8] The response of partially oxidised acid sulfate soil materials to anoxia
    Ward, NJ
    Sullivan, LA
    Bush, RT
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (5-6): : 515 - 525
  • [9] Responses in growth, yield and cob protein content of baby corn (Zea mays) to amendment of an acid sulfate soil with lime, organic fertiliser and biochar
    Thi, Loan K.
    Yunusa, Isa A. M.
    Rab, M. A.
    Zerihun, Ayalsew
    Nguyen, Hoa M.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2023, 74 (02): : 90 - 100
  • [10] INFLUENCE OF DRAINAGE ON PH, SULFATE CONTENT AND MECHANICAL STRENGTH OF A POTENTIAL ACID SULFATE SOIL IN FIJI
    RICHMOND, TDA
    WILLIAMS, J
    DATT, U
    TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 1975, 52 (04): : 325 - 334