Switching perception of musical meters by listening to different acoustic cues of biphasic sound stimulus

被引:0
|
作者
Kondoh, Sotaro [1 ]
Okanoya, Kazuo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tachibana, Ryosuke O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Life Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Ctr Evolutionary Cognit Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[3] RIKEN Ctr Brain Sci, Saitama, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 08期
关键词
RHYTHM; BEAT; ATTENTION; RESPONSES; SALIENCE; ACCENT; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0256712
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Meter is one of the core features of music perception. It is the cognitive grouping of regular sound sequences, typically for every 2, 3, or 4 beats. Previous studies have suggested that one can not only passively perceive the meter from acoustic cues such as loudness, pitch, and duration of sound elements, but also actively perceive it by paying attention to isochronous sound events without any acoustic cues. Studying the interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in meter perception leads to understanding the cognitive system's ability to perceive the entire structure of music. The present study aimed to demonstrate that meter perception requires the top-down process (which maintains and switches attention between cues) as well as the bottom-up process for discriminating acoustic cues. We created a "biphasic" sound stimulus, which consists of successive tone sequences designed to provide cues for both the triple and quadruple meters in different sound attributes, frequency, and duration. Participants were asked to focus on either frequency or duration of the stimulus, and to answer how they perceived meters on a five-point scale (ranged from "strongly triple" to "strongly quadruple"). As a result, we found that participants perceived different meters by switching their attention to specific cues. This result adds evidence to the idea that meter perception involves the interaction between top-down and bottom-up processes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF STIMULUS LEVEL ON PERCEPTION OF 2 ACOUSTIC CUES IN SPEECH
    VANTASELL, DJ
    CRUMP, ESA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 70 (05): : 1527 - 1529
  • [2] Effects of acoustic and semantic cues on listening effort during native and non-native speech perception
    Borghini, Giulia
    Hazan, Valerie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 147 (06): : 3783 - 3794
  • [3] What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
    Knoeferle, Klemens
    Li, Jixing
    Maggioni, Emanuela
    Spence, Charles
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [4] What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings
    Klemens Knoeferle
    Jixing Li
    Emanuela Maggioni
    Charles Spence
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [5] The sound of silence: children's own perspectives on their hearing and listening in classrooms with different acoustic conditions
    Vettori, Giulia
    Di Leonardo, Laura
    Secchi, Simone
    Bigozzi, Lucia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [6] Do Adults With Cochlear Implants Rely on Different Acoustic Cues for Phoneme Perception Than Adults With Normal Hearing?
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    Lowenstein, Joanna H.
    Tarr, Eric
    Caldwell-Tarr, Amanda
    Welling, D. Bradley
    Shahin, Antoine J.
    Nittrouer, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2014, 57 (02): : 566 - 582
  • [7] Influence of different acoustic cues in L1 lexical tone on the perception of L2 lexical stress using principal component analysis: an ERP study
    Yaxuan Meng
    Juan Zhang
    Shun Liu
    Chenggang Wu
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2020, 238 : 1489 - 1498
  • [8] Influence of different acoustic cues in L1 lexical tone on the perception of L2 lexical stress using principal component analysis: an ERP study
    Meng, Yaxuan
    Zhang, Juan
    Liu, Shun
    Wu, Chenggang
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 238 (06) : 1489 - 1498