Results of a patient dose survey on diagnostic radiology in Lithuania

被引:6
|
作者
Ziliukas, J [1 ]
Morkunas, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Radiat Protect Ctr, LT-08221 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nch529
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the most effective means towards optimisation of radiation protection for patients undergoing radiodiagnostic examinations are the diagnostic reference levels. In order to ensure the effective use of these levels, they have to be set properly. National characteristics, such as the conditions of the radiological equipments, the training of the staff, the availability of quality assurance systems, etc., have to be taken into account when these levels are established, Measurements under real conditions were considered as the best tools to achieve these reference levels. With an aim to establish the Lithuanian national diagnostic reference levels, the nationwide survey of entrance surface doses received by the patients during the most typical X-ray examinations has been performed. The most common types of examinations, such as chest PA, skull PA and LAT, abdomen AP, lumbar spine AP and LAT, thorax spine AP and LAT, and hip joint AP, were included in the list of procedures under consideration. Hospitals of different size and levels using different X-ray machines were represented in the survey. The standard thermoluminescence dosemeter techniques with pellets attached to the skin of the patient in the centre of radiation field were applied. The data were analysed statistically, and the averages and 75th percentile were calculated. The results show that the Lithuanian diagnostic reference levels might be rather close to the ones promoted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Commission.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 175
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient dose in diagnostic radiology
    Noel, Alain
    Physics for Medical Imaging Applications, 2007, 240 : 397 - 404
  • [2] Patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology and dose measurement I practice - A pilot survey
    Ciraj, O
    Kosutic, D
    Markovic, S
    APPLIED PHYSICS IN SERBIA-APS, 2002, : 317 - 320
  • [3] PATIENT DOSE REDUCTION IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY
    KERR, IH
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1991, 43 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [4] A Nordic survey of patient doses in diagnostic radiology
    Gron, P
    Olerud, HM
    Einarsson, G
    Leitz, W
    Servomaa, A
    Schoultz, BW
    Hjardenmaal, O
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (12) : 1988 - 1992
  • [5] A Nordic survey of patient doses in diagnostic radiology
    P. Grøn
    H. M. Olerud
    G. Einarsson
    W. Leitz
    A. Servomaa
    B. W. Schoultz
    O. Hjardemaal
    European Radiology, 2000, 10 : 1988 - 1992
  • [6] Patient dose in interventional radiology:: A European survey
    Vano, E.
    Jarvinen, H.
    Kosunen, A.
    Bly, R.
    Malone, J.
    Dowling, A.
    Larkin, A.
    Padovani, R.
    Bosmans, H.
    Dragusin, O.
    Jaschke, W.
    Torbica, P.
    Back, C.
    Schreiner, A.
    Bokou, C.
    Kottou, S.
    Tsapaki, V.
    Jankowski, J.
    Papierz, S.
    Domienik, J.
    Werduch, A.
    Nikodemova, D.
    Salat, D.
    Kepler, K.
    Bor, M. D.
    Vassileva, J.
    Borisova, R.
    Pellet, S.
    Corbett, R. H.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) : 39 - 45
  • [7] Elaboration of New NDRLs as Part of Third National Patient Dose Survey in Diagnostic Radiology in Bulgaria
    Dimov, Asen
    Tsanev, Ivan
    Ivanova, Desislava
    Simeonov, Filip
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2018, VOL 2, 2019, 68 (02): : 33 - 37
  • [8] THE EFFECT OF FIELD SIZE ON THE DOSE TO THE PATIENT IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY
    HAYBITTLE, JL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1957, 30 (360): : 663 - 665
  • [9] International Symposium: Patient Dose Reduction in Diagnostic Radiology
    Lief, Eugene
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3696 - 3697
  • [10] Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro
    Milatovic, Aleksandra
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera
    Ivanovic, Sonja
    Jovanovic, Slobodan
    Spasic-Jokic, Vesna
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 149 (04) : 454 - 463