Nitrogen and carbon transformations, water use efficiency and ecosystem productivity in monocultures and wheat-bean intercropping systems

被引:47
|
作者
Chapagain, Tejendra [1 ]
Riseman, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
Intercropping; N-transfer; Net ecosystem CO2 exchange; Ecosystem respiration; Gross ecosystem photosynthesis; Net ecosystem productivity; SOIL CO2; FIXATION; ISOTOPE; PEA; DYNAMICS; GROWTH; MAIZE; N2O;
D O I
10.1007/s10705-014-9647-4
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC), nitrogen (N) and water use efficiency (WUE) are significant challenges in intensive wheat production. An intercropping system combining wheat and grain legumes may help maintain SOC, soil mineral N and WUE while also providing an opportunity to sequester carbon (C) in low input organic systems. We grew wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. 'Scarlet') as a monoculture and intercropped with either common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. 'Red Kidney', or cv. 'Black Turtle'), or fava bean (Vicia faba cv. 'Bell') in rows of 1:1, 2 wheat: 1 bean or broadcast arrangement without fertilizers for 2 years to assess the effects of genotype and spatial arrangement on biological nitrogen fixation and seasonal transfer, WUE, gross ecosystem photosynthesis (GEP), and net ecosystem productivity (NEP). Stable isotope methods (C-13 and N-15 natural abundance) were used to quantify C and N within the plant and soil system. Field CO2 exchange measurements used a dynamic closed transparent chamber connected to a portable CO2 analyzer. Intercropped plots had higher percent N derived from symbiotic N-2 fixation, and increased C and N accumulation compared to monocultured wheat. The fava bean cv. Bell intercrops showed increased nodulation (60-80 % more nodules) and percent N derived from symbiotic N-2 fixation (10-12 % higher) compared to common beans resulting in the fixation of 74 kg N ha(-1) biologically from the 1:1 arrangement. The highest rate of N-transfer (13 %) was observed in the wheat-fava bean cv. Bell combination when planted in the 1:1 arrangement. All intercrops accumulated more N in shoot biomass compared to monoculture wheat with wheat-fava bean cv. Bell (1:1 arrangement) accumulating the highest N (34 kg N ha(-1), i.e., 176 % higher) and C (214 g C m(-2) year(-1), i.e., 26 % higher). All plots fixed the most CO2 (i.e., greatest GEP) during mid-growth stage (50 days after seeding i.e., prior to flowering) however, wheat-fava bean cv. Bell in the 1:1 arrangement displayed the greatest NEP sequestering C at the seasonal daytime average rate of 208 mg C m(-2) h(-1) (i.e., 7 % higher than wheat monoculture plots). Intrinsic WUE of wheat, as indicated by delta C-13, was also improved when grown with fava bean cv. Bell or common bean cv. Red Kidney. This study demonstrated that intercropping wheat and fava bean is an effective strategy to achieve greater nitrogen fixation and transfer to the wheat counterparts, higher WUE, and ecosystem productivity than wheat monocultures in areas with low soil N and C. Furthermore, the wheat-fava bean cv. Bell (1:1 arrangement) was more productive than either the 2:1 or mixed planting arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 121
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nitrogen and carbon transformations, water use efficiency and ecosystem productivity in monocultures and wheat-bean intercropping systems
    Tejendra Chapagain
    Andrew Riseman
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2015, 101 : 107 - 121
  • [2] Water capture efficiency, use efficiency and productivity in sole cropping and intercropping of rapeseed, bean and corn
    Najibnia, S.
    Koocheki, A.
    Mahallati, Nassiri
    Porsa, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 3 (04): : 347 - 358
  • [3] Simultaneous Assessment of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rain-Fed Chickpea-Durum Wheat Intercropping Systems
    Kherif, Omar
    Haddad, Benalia
    Bouras, Fatma-Zohra
    Seghouani, Mounir
    Zemmouri, Bahia
    Gamouh, Ramzi
    Hamzaoui, Nadia
    Larbi, Amira
    Rebouh, Nazih-Yacer
    Latati, Mourad
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [4] Barley-pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations
    Chapagain, Tejendra
    Riseman, Andrew
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 166 : 18 - 25
  • [5] Cotton/mung bean intercropping improves crop productivity, water use efficiency, nitrogen uptake, and economic benefits in the arid area of Northwest China
    Liang, Jiaping
    He, Zijian
    Shi, Wenjuan
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 240 (240)
  • [6] Improving productivity and water use efficiency by intercropping cactus and millet
    Souza, Marcondes de Sa
    Araujo Jr, George do Nascimento
    Jardim, Alexandre Manicoba da Rosa Ferraz
    de Souza, Carlos Andre Alves
    Pinheiro, Antonio Gebson
    de Souza, Luciana Sandra Bastos
    Salvador, Kaique Renan da Silva
    Leite, Renan Matheus Cordeiro
    Alves, Cleber Pereira
    da Silva, Thieres George Freire
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2023, 72 (04) : 982 - 998
  • [7] Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping
    Agegnehu, Getachew
    Ghizaw, Amare
    Sinebo, Woldeyesus
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 28 (02) : 257 - 263
  • [8] Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping
    Getachew Agegnehu
    Amare Ghizaw
    Woldeyesus Sinebo
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2008, 28 : 257 - 263
  • [9] PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF PEANUT-MILLET INTERCROPPING
    Feng, Liangshan
    Sun, Zhanxiang
    Zheng, Muzi
    Muchoki, Mwangi
    Zheng, Jiaming
    Yang, Ning
    Bai, Wei
    Feng, Chen
    Zhang, Zhe
    Cai, Qian
    Zhang, Dongsheng
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2016, 48 (04) : 1459 - 1466
  • [10] Determining effects of water and nitrogen inputs on wheat yield and water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in China: A quantitative synthesis
    Li, Zhou
    Zhang, Qingping
    Wei, Wanrong
    Cui, Song
    Tang, Wei
    Li, Yuan
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 242