Energy Futures: Five Dilemmas of the Practice of Anticipatory Governance

被引:21
|
作者
Davies, Sarah R. [1 ]
Selin, Cynthia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Nanotechnol Soc, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Nanotechnology; Energy; Public Participation; Deliberation; Reflexivity; Anticipatory Governance; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; SCIENCE; CONTROVERSIES; INTERVENTION; DELIBERATION; PERSPECTIVES; TECHNOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/17524032.2011.644632
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Public participation has become standard practice in both environmental communication and science and technology studies, with such engagement increasingly moving "upstream" to the early stages of technological development. One framework for these activities is anticipatory governance, in which foresight and public and stakeholder engagement are used to reflect on-and direct-the impacts of new technology. In this essay we draw on our experience of anticipatory governance, in the shape of the "NanoFutures" project on energy futures, to present a reflexive analysis of engagement and deliberation. We draw out five tensions of the practice of deliberation on energy technologies. Through tracing the lineages of these dilemmas, we discuss some of the implications of these tensions for the practice of civic engagement and deliberation in a set of questions for this community of practitioner-scholars.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 136
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条