Ready for shared decision making: Pretesting a training module for health professionals on sharing decisions with their patients

被引:12
|
作者
Kienlin, Simone [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nytroen, Kari [3 ,4 ]
Stacey, Dawn [5 ,6 ]
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Langnes, Norway
[2] South Eastern Norway Reg Hlth Author, Dept Med & Healthcare, Hamar, Norway
[3] Univ Hosp North Norway, Div Internal Med, Tromso, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] OsloMET Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing & Hlth Promot, Oslo, Norway
关键词
curriculum; decision making; interprofessional; medical education; training; shared decision making; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13380
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction While shared decision-making (SDM) training programmes for health professionals have been developed in several countries, few have been evaluated. In Norway, a comprehensive curriculum, "klar for samvalg" (ready for SDM), for interprofessional health-care teams was created using generic didactic methods and guidance to tailor training to various contexts. The programmes adapted didactic methods from an evidence-based German training programmes (doktormitSDM). The overall aim was to evaluate two particular SDM modules on facilitating SDM implementation into clinical practice. Method A descriptive mixed methods study using questionnaires and a focus group guided by the Medical Research Council Complex Interventions Framework. The training was provided as two different applications (module AB [introduction and SDM-basics] and module ABC [introduction, SDM-basics and interactive training]) with differing learning objectives, extent of interactivity, and duration (1 vs 2 hours). Groups of participants were recruited consecutively based on requests for health professional SDM training in university/college- and hospital-settings. By a focus group and a self-administered questionnaire comprehensibility, relevance and acceptance were assessed and qualitative feedback collected after the training. Data passed descriptive and content analysis, respectively. Knowledge was assessed twice using five multiple-choice items and analysed using paired t-tests. Results In 11 (six AB and five ABC) training sessions, 357/429 (296 AB and 133 ABC) eligible nurses, physicians and health professional students with varying clinical backgrounds and previous levels of SDM-knowledge participated. SDM-knowledge increased from 25-78% (range pretest) to 85-95% (range post-test) (P <= .001). The training was rated easy to understand, acceptable and relevant for practice. Findings to improve the education suggest higher emphasis on interprofessional teaching methods. Conclusions The two SDM training modules met the basic requirements for use in a broader SDM implementation strategy and can even improve knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 621
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Training health professionals in shared decision making: Update of an international environmental scan
    Diouf, Ndeye Thiab
    Menear, Matthew
    Robitaille, Hubert
    Guerard, Genevieve Painchaud
    Legare, France
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (11) : 1753 - 1758
  • [2] Training health professionals in shared decision-making: An international environmental scan
    Legare, France
    Politi, Mary C.
    Drolet, Renee
    Desroches, Sophie
    Stacey, Dawn
    Bekker, Hilary
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 88 (02) : 159 - 169
  • [3] Ready for SDM- evaluation of an interprofessional training module in shared decision making - A cluster randomized trial
    Kienlin, Simone
    Stacey, Dawn
    Nytroen, Kari
    Grafe, Alexander
    Kasper, Juergen
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (07) : 2307 - 2314
  • [4] Development of Shared Decision-Making Training Module for Patients Facing Preference-Sensitive Decisions regarding Major Surgical Procedures
    Gainer, Ryan
    Hirsch, Greg
    Hirsch, Elias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [5] Perceptions of shared decision making among health care professionals
    Chung, Min-Chun
    Juang, Wang-Chuan
    Li, Ying-Chun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 1080 - 1087
  • [6] When the business of sharing treatment decisions is not the same as shared decision making: A discourse analysis of decision sharing in general practice
    Robertson, Maggie
    Moir, Jim
    Skelton, John
    Dowell, Jon
    Cowan, Sue
    [J]. HEALTH, 2011, 15 (01): : 78 - 95
  • [7] Shared decision making and workload among Dutch health care professionals
    Schouteten, Roel
    Jansen, Lotte
    [J]. GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 2019, 32 (04): : 279 - 298
  • [8] Shared decision making in oncology: A model based on patients', health care professionals', and researchers' views
    Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
    Fischer, Maarten J.
    van Duijn-Bakker, Nanny
    Baas-Thijssen, Monique C.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (01) : 139 - 146
  • [9] Patients' Perceptions of Sharing in Decisions A Systematic Review of Interventions to Enhance Shared Decision Making in Routine Clinical Practice
    Legare, France
    Turcotte, Stephane
    Stacey, Dawn
    Ratte, Stephane
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Graham, Ian D.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [10] Training Interventions to Equip Health Care Professionals With Shared Decision-Making Skills: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Coates, Dominiek
    Clerke, Teena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2020, 40 (02) : 100 - 119