A quantitative comparison of two kits for DNA extraction from canned tuna

被引:3
|
作者
Servusova, Eliska [1 ,2 ]
Babak, Vladimir [1 ]
Piskata, Zora [1 ]
Krcmar, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Res Inst, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Vet & Pharmaceut Sci Brno, Fac Vet Hyg & Ecol, Dept Meat Hyg & Technol, Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
Canned product; DNA isolation; real-time PCR; Thunnus albacares; Katsuwonus pelamis; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; MUSCLE; FRESH;
D O I
10.2754/avb201988030315
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The most common methods that can be used for species identification of tuna include methods based on detection of species-specific DNA via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The problem with DNA detection in processed products is the possibility of DNA fragmentation during the technological process. The quantity and quality of extracted DNA is a crucial step for species identification based on the DNA analysis. In this study, two DNA extraction methods (DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit and DNeasy mericon Food Kit) for tuna DNA isolation were compared. Eight food products of canned tuna (three of them were declared as Thunnus albacares and five products were declared as Katsuwonus pelamis) with a different addition of various ingredients were tested. Furthermore, three different times of proteolysis (30 min, 60 min, overnight) for each sample and each extraction kit were evaluated. The DNA concentration was determined by a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit fluorescence method and quantified using a Qubit fluorometer. The DNA purity was evaluated using the A260/A280 ratio of absorbances measured on a spectrophotometer. The main indicator of DNA quality and quantity was its amplifiability in the subsequent real-time PCR for Thunnus species, Thunnus albacares and Katsuwonus pelamis. Based on the results, both kits can be used for tuna species determination in highly heat-treated products with different composition, nevertheless, the DNeasy mericon Food Kit provided better statistical values in some parameters. The effect of different times of proteolysis was significant in most of the samples with regard to the crossing point values determined by real-time PCR.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of DNA extraction methods from muscle of canned tuna for species identification
    Jose Chapela, Maria
    Sotelo, Carmen G.
    Perez-Martin, Ricardo I.
    Pardo, Miguel Angel
    Perez-Villareal, Begona
    Gilardi, Patricia
    Riese, Juan
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2007, 18 (10) : 1211 - 1215
  • [2] Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for the Detection of Canned Tuna Species with DNA Mini-Barcoding
    Emmi, Aubrey J.
    Fatusin, Biola
    Hellberg, Rosalee S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 2023, 2023
  • [3] Comparison of three DNA extraction kits for detection of Mycoplasma suis DNA from blood as assessed by quantitative PCR
    Colon, Nahimarys
    Messick, Joanne B.
    Santos, Andrea P.
    do Nascimento, Naila
    Johnson, Kathy
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247
  • [4] Comparison of commercial kits for the extraction of DNA from paddy soils
    Knauth, S.
    Schmidt, H.
    Tippkoetter, R.
    [J]. LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 56 (03) : 222 - 228
  • [5] Comparison of two commercial DNA extraction kits for the analysis of nasopharyngeal bacterial communities
    Perez-Losada, Marcos
    Crandall, Keith A.
    Freishtat, Robert J.
    [J]. AIMS MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 2 (02): : 108 - 119
  • [6] Comparison of the efficiency of DNA extraction from Aspergillus fumigatus spores using five commercial kits and quantitative PCR
    Nawrot, U.
    Wlodarczyk, K.
    Wasik, A.
    Sadakierska-Chudy, A.
    Dobosz, T.
    [J]. MYCOSES, 2009, 52 : 94 - 95
  • [7] Comparison of 4 commercial kits for the extraction of circulating DNA from plasma
    Warton, Kristina
    Graham, Lisa-Jane
    Yuwono, Nicole
    Samimi, Goli
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS, 2018, 228 : 143 - 150
  • [8] A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples
    Claassen, Shantelle
    du Toit, Elloise
    Kaba, Mamadou
    Moodley, Clinton
    Zar, Heather J.
    Nicol, Mark P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 94 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [9] Comparison of 12 DNA extraction kits for vertebrate samples
    Martincova, I
    Aghova, T.
    [J]. ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 43 (01) : 67 - +
  • [10] Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples
    Smith, K
    Diggle, MA
    Clarke, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 2440 - 2443