Technology insight: PET and PET/CT in head and neck tumor staging and radiation therapy planning

被引:22
|
作者
Frank, SJ
Chao, KSC
Schwartz, DL
Weber, RS
Apisarnthanarax, S
Macapinlac, HA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Expt Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY | 2005年 / 2卷 / 10期
关键词
FDG; head and neck cancer; PET/CT; radiation therapy; treatment planning;
D O I
10.1038/ncponc0322
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The evolving utilization of functional imaging, mainly 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ((18)FDG) imaging, with positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT, is profoundly altering head and neck tumor staging approaches, radiation treatment planning, and follow-up management. Tumor-node-metastasis staging with PET/CT has improved the characterization of patient disease versus CT, MRI, or PET alone, thereby affecting patient disease management. Therefore, the utilization of PET/CT is appropriate for head and neck cancer staging in the initial presentation and in the recurrent setting. In the setting of radiation therapy treatment planning, PET-directed tumor volume contouring is not ready for clinical practice without further technological improvements in imaging specificity/sensitivity and resolution. Patient or organ motion might interfere with the accuracy of anatomical co-alignment, and variability in defining the threshold of imaging signals on PET images can affect the contour of the biological tumor volume. The use of PET/CT for staging and detecting both primary and recurrent head and neck cancer is valuable; however, its application in radiation treatment planning should be viewed as investigational.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 533
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technology Insight: PET and PET/CT in head and neck tumor staging and radiation therapy planning
    Steven J Frank
    KS Clifford Chao
    David L Schwartz
    Randal S Weber
    Smith Apisarnthanarax
    Homer A Macapinlac
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2005, 2 : 526 - 533
  • [2] High resolution PET/CT imaging for head and neck radiation therapy planning
    Raylman, Raymond
    Sompalli, Prashanth
    Clinthorne, Neal
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [3] High resolution PET/CT imaging for head and neck radiation therapy planning
    Raylman, Raymond
    Sompalli, Prashanth
    Clinthorne, Neal
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [4] Clinical evidence on PET-CT for radiation therapy planning in head and neck tumours
    Troost, Esther G. C.
    Schinagl, Dominic A. X.
    Bussink, Johan
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    Kaanders, Johannes H. A. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (03) : 328 - 334
  • [5] Utility of (18)FDG-PET/CT for head and neck cancer staging, radiation therapy planning, and follow-up
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Ghosh, Partha
    Lee, Percy
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 2 (03) : 241 - 248
  • [6] PET AND PET/CT TECHNOLOGY FOR RADIATION THERAPY
    Beyer, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S5 - S6
  • [7] Deformable Registration of Preoperative PET/CT with Postoperative Radiation Therapy Planning CT in Head and Neck Cancer
    Kovalchuk, Nataliya
    Jalisi, Scharukh
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    Truong, Minh T.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2012, 32 (05) : 1329 - 1341
  • [8] PET/CT in CT Simulation: Significance of a Standardized Positioning Protocol for Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Planning
    Tolekidis, G.
    Choi, M.
    Mai, M.
    Diaz, A. Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (04): : 923 - 923
  • [9] PET-CT in radiation treatment planning for head and neck cancer
    de Jong, J. M. A.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, : 99 - 100
  • [10] PET/MR versus PET/CT in the Initial Staging of Head and Neck Cancer
    Sekine, T.
    Barbosa, F.
    Kuhn, F.
    Burger, I.
    von Schulthess, G.
    Veit-Haibach, P.
    Huellner, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S253 - S254