Towards a representative assessment of methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation options from manure management of beef cattle feedlots in Brazil

被引:3
|
作者
Costa Junior, C. [1 ]
Cerri, C. E. P. [2 ]
Dorich, C. D. [3 ]
Maia, S. M. F. [4 ]
Bernoux, M. [5 ]
Cerri, C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Nucl Energy Agr, Lab Biogeochem, BR-13416000 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ New Hampshire, Inst Study Earth Ocean & Space, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[4] Inst Fed Alagoas IFAL, BR-57035350 Maceio, AL, Brazil
[5] SupAgro, IRD, INRA, UMR Eco & Sols Funct Ecol & Soil Biogeochemestry, F-34060 Montpellier, France
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Animal manure; Activity data; Emission assessment; Methane; Nitrous oxide; AGRICULTURE; SYSTEMS; CARBON;
D O I
10.1007/s11027-013-9499-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We conducted an inventory to estimate methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from beef cattle feedlot manure in Brazil for the year of 2010. The aim was to determine (CH4) and (N2O) emissions from beef cattle feedlot manure in Brazil using the IPCC United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change approach and present a framework that structures priority research for decreasing uncertainties and assessing mitigation scenarios. The analysis consisted of the use of specific farm-scale activity data applied to the 2006 (IPCC) guideline equations for animal manure management updated with specific parameters for Brazil conditions. Uncertainties were assessed by error-propagation technique. The results indicated that 376.6 GgCO(2)eq were emitted from the manure management of beef cattle feedlots in Brazil in 2010. Nitrous oxide accounted for 61 % of total emissions, out of which 69 % came from direct emissions. Uncertainties were high, comprising -30 to +80 %. Solid storage-heap and field application were the largest sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (81 % of total emissions) and held most of the variance in uncertainties. Although, due to limitations in the IPCC methodology for integrating GHG emissions at farm-scale, we could not account for emissions occurring from different lengths of time in each manure management compartment prior to field application. As a consequence, this GHG inventory lacks consistence. The use of more robust methodologies such as process-based models are recommended for improvements, however they are currently unavailable because there is a lack of key data for Brazil conditions for validating those models. Our literature revision shows that the most effective research for raising those data would track emissions from manure: generated from male Nellore (Bos Indicus) cattle fed for 90 days with a high-energy diet, removed only at the end of feeding period and held in heaps over 60 days before being applied to maize (Zea mays L.) cropping fields under clay soil. The proposed research and methodology approaches described in this work is required to establish a manure management emission assessment that will become more responsive to the changing practices on Brazilian beef cattle feedlots and, consequently, permitting implication of mitigation scenarios to be ascertained.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 438
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards a representative assessment of methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation options from manure management of beef cattle feedlots in Brazil
    C. Costa Junior
    C. E. P. Cerri
    C. D. Dorich
    S. M. F. Maia
    M. Bernoux
    C. C. Cerri
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, 20 : 425 - 438
  • [2] Emission factors for methane and nitrous oxide from manure management and mitigation options
    Groenestein, Karin
    Mosquera, Julio
    Van der Sluis, Sietske
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2012, 9 : 139 - 146
  • [3] Influence of diet on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from cattle manure
    Nampoothiri V.M.
    Mohini M.
    Thakur S.S.
    Mondal G.
    [J]. Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 9 (3) : 187 - 193
  • [4] Nitrous oxide emissions from cattle production systems and mitigation options
    Amon, B
    Amon, T
    Alt, C
    Moitzi, G
    Boxberger, J
    [J]. PHYTON-ANNALES REI BOTANICAE, 2001, 41 (03) : 17 - 28
  • [5] SPECIAL TOPICS-Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options
    Montes, F.
    Meinen, R.
    Dell, C.
    Rotz, A.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Oh, J.
    Waghorn, G.
    Gerber, P. J.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H. P. S.
    Dijkstra, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (11) : 5070 - 5094
  • [6] Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta-analysis and integrated assessment
    Hou, Yong
    Velthof, Gerard L.
    Oenema, Oene
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (03) : 1293 - 1312
  • [7] Measuring and modeling nitrous oxide and methane emissions from beef cattle feedlot manure management: First assessments under Brazilian condition
    Costa, Ciniro, Jr.
    Li, Changsheng
    Cerri, Carlos E. P.
    Cerri, Carlos C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 2014, 49 (09) : 696 - 711
  • [8] Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
    Zheng X.
    Wang M.
    Wang Y.
    Shen R.
    Li J.
    Heyer J.
    Koegge M.
    Papen H.
    Jin J.
    Li L.
    [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 17 (1) : 83 - 92
  • [9] Mitigation options for methane, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from agricultural ecosystems
    Zheng, XH
    Wang, MX
    Wang, YS
    Shen, RX
    Li, J
    Heyer, J
    Koegge, M
    Papen, H
    Jin, JS
    Li, LT
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2000, 17 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [10] Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management
    Sommer, SG
    Petersen, SO
    Moller, HB
    [J]. NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2004, 69 (02) : 143 - 154