Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: Comparing time-related contrasts between two groups

被引:305
|
作者
Hedeker, D
Gibbons, RD
Waternaux, C
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
clustering; hierarchical linear models; missing data; multilevel models; mixed-effects models; repeated measures; statistical power;
D O I
10.3102/10769986024001070
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Formulas for estimating sample sizes are presented to provide specified levels of power for tests of significance from a longitudinal design allowing for subject attrition. These formulas are derived for a comparison of two groups in terms of single degree-of-freedom contrasts of population means across the study timepoints. Contrasts of this type can often capture the main and interaction effects in a two-group repeated measures design. For example, a two-group comparison of either an average across time or a specific trend across time (e.g., linear or quadratic) can be considered. Since longitudinal data with attrition are often analyzed using an unbalanced repeated measures model (with a structured variance-covariance matrix for the repeated measures) or a random-effects model for incomplete longitudinal data, the variance-covariance matrix of the repeated measures is allowed to assume a variety of forms. Tables are presented listing sample size determinations assuming compound symmetry, a first-order autoregressive structure, and a non-stationary random-effects structure. Examples are provided to illustrate use of the formulas, and a computer program implementing the procedure is available from the first author.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 93
页数:24
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Sample size determination for hierarchical longitudinal designs with differential attrition rates
    Roy, Anindya
    Bhaumik, Dulal K.
    Aryal, Subhash
    Gibbons, Robert D.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2007, 63 (03) : 699 - 707
  • [2] Sample Size Estimation when Comparing More than Two Treatment Groups
    Alan Phillips
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 1998, 32 (1): : 193 - 199
  • [3] Sample size estimation when comparing more than two treatment groups
    Phillips, A
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 1998, 32 (01): : 193 - 199
  • [4] Sample size calculation for comparing multiple groups in cross-over designs
    Jo, Yongjun
    Park, Taesung
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2017, : 1769 - 1771
  • [5] Sample size calculations for comparing two groups of count data
    Wang, Lin
    Fan, Chunpeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 29 (01) : 115 - 127
  • [6] SAMPLE-SIZE ESTIMATION FOR COMPARING 2 OR MORE TREATMENT GROUPS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DAY, SJ
    GRAHAM, DF
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [7] Estimation and expected sample size in Simon's two stage designs that stop as early as possible
    Daletzakis, Antonios
    van den Bor, Rutger
    Jonker, Marianne A.
    Roes, Kit C. B.
    van Tinteren, Harm
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2022, 21 (05) : 879 - 894
  • [8] Power and sample size calculations for longitudinal studies comparing rates of change with a time-varying exposure
    Basagana, X.
    Spiegelman, D.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [9] Bayesian sample size calculation for estimation of the difference between two binomial proportions
    Pezeshk, Hamid
    Nematollahi, Nader
    Maroufy, Vahed
    Marriott, Paul
    Gittins, John
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (06) : 598 - 611
  • [10] Estimating sample size for continuous outcomes, comparing more than two parallel groups with unequal sizes
    Singer, J
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1997, 16 (24) : 2805 - 2811