Solitary Penile Metastasis of Prostate Cancer on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Imaging in a Patient With PSA of 1 ng/mL

被引:7
|
作者
Salavati, Ali [1 ]
Schik, Allyssa N. [1 ]
Koksel, Yasemin [1 ]
Gencturk, Mehmet [1 ]
Froelich, Jerry W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Radiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
penile metastasis; prostate cancer; F-18-fluciclovine; prostatic-specific antigen; prostatic-specific antigen doubling time; definitive external beam radiation therapy; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000002987
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
An 85-year-old asymptomatic man with suspected biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer underwent an F-18-fluciclovine PET/CT scan, which revealed a solitary suspicious tracer uptake in the dorsal right corporal body of the proximal pendulous penis. The patient underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the penile lesion, which revealed metastatic prostate cancer. The patient had definitive external beam radiation therapy 3 years before the examination. At the time of scan, the prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) was only 1.0 ng/mL, although the PSA doubling time was 2.6 months. It is unusual to detect a solitary penile metastasis in a patient with a low level of PSA.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 391
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT detection of biochemical recurrent prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels <2.00 ng/mL
    Garza, Daniel
    Kandathil, Asha
    Xi, Yin
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 42 (08) : 907 - 913
  • [2] Cavernosal Metastasis From Prostate Cancer on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT
    Nguyen, Ba D.
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (10) : E449 - E450
  • [3] Positive Findings on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Recurrent Prostate Cancer and PSA levels ≤ 0.5 and ≤ 0.3 ng/ml
    Lovec, P.
    Savir-Baruch, B.
    Gupta, G.
    Wagner, R.
    Gabriel, M. S.
    Harkenrider, M. M.
    Solanki, A. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : S161 - S161
  • [4] UK guidelines on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in prostate cancer imaging
    Afaq, Asim
    Gleeson, Fergus
    Scarsbrook, Andrew
    Bradley, Kevin
    Subesinghe, Manil
    Macpherson, Ruth
    Haroon, Athar
    Patel, Neel
    Chua, Sue
    Wong, Wai-Lup
    Vinjamuri, Sobhan
    Warbey, Victoria S.
    Cook, Gary J.
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 40 (07) : 662 - 674
  • [5] 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Detection of Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma in Patients With Serum PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL After Definitive Primary Treatment
    England, Joseph R.
    Paluch, Jeremy
    Ballas, Leslie K.
    Jadvar, Hossein
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (03) : e128 - e132
  • [6] Update on 18F-Fluciclovine PET for Prostate Cancer Imaging
    Parent, Ephraim E.
    Schuster, David M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (05) : 733 - 739
  • [7] 18F-fluciclovine PET or PSMA PET for prostate cancer imaging?
    Baris Turkbey
    Peter L. Choyke
    [J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2020, 17 : 9 - 10
  • [8] PROSTATE CANCER 18F-fluciclovine PET or PSMA PET for prostate cancer imaging?
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2020, 17 (01) : 9 - 10
  • [9] PSA and PSA Kinetics as Predictors for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Positivity in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Crocerossa, Fabio
    Carbonara, Umberto
    Parekh, Jayashree
    Urdaneta, Alfredo
    Weprin, Samuel
    Damiano, Rocco
    Grob, Mayer B.
    Hampton, Lance J.
    Paul, Asit
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Cantiello, Francesco
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, : 920 - 927
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with rising PSA level ≤ 0.5 ng/ml after multiple treatment failures
    Teyateeti, Ajalaya
    Teyateeti, Achiraya
    Ravizzini, Gregory C.
    Xu, Guofan
    Tang, Chad
    Tu, Shi-ming
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    Lu, Yang
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 11 (02): : 87 - 98