Divergent skills policy trajectories in England and Scotland after Leitch

被引:13
|
作者
Payne, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Social Sci, ESRC Ctr Skills Knowledge & Org Performance SKOPE, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
关键词
devolution; England; Scotland; skills policy; skills utilisation;
D O I
10.1080/01442870902899996
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The UK Labour government has consistently argued that boosting the supply of skilled, qualified labour is 'the key' to national economic success and social justice, a position recently endorsed by the Leitch Review of Skills. However, while the argument that skills have an important role to play is widely accepted, Leitch's assertion that 'skills are the most important lever' remains contentious. Political devolution means that while the UK government retains control over skills policy in England, this is not the case in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland where education and training is a matter for their respective parliaments and assemblies. Indeed, there are interesting differences of approach emerging in terms of how the 'skills problem' is understood and the forms of policy interventions that are needed. While English policy-makers have embraced the Leitch agenda and are focused narrowly on boosting skills supply and matching overseas levels of qualification stocks, their Scottish counterparts are stressing the need for skills to be utilised effectively at work and are seeking to integrate skills policy within a wider business improvement, innovation and economic development agenda. This article examines these contrasting approaches, together with the main challenges they confront. It argues that there is an opportunity for Scotland to lead the way in developing a more integrative approach to skills policy that addresses key issues of skill demand and usage. However, translating this new policy position into practical policy interventions will require a process of policy learning. In the longer term, there is the potential for Scotland's approach to challenge the assumptions upon which English policy is based.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 494
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Divergent geographies of policy and practice? Voluntarism and devolution in England, Scotland and Wales
    Woolvin, Mike
    Mills, Sarah
    Hardill, Irene
    Rutherford, Alasdair
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 181 (01): : 38 - 46
  • [4] Creativity development trajectories in Elementary Education: Differences in divergent and evaluative skills
    Alfonso-Benlliure, Vicente
    Romo Santos, Manuela
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2016, 19 : 160 - 174
  • [5] Higher Education in Scotland and England after Devolution
    Keating, Michael
    [J]. REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES, 2005, 15 (04): : 423 - 435
  • [6] Rural policy in Scotland after devolution
    Keating, M
    Stevenson, L
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 40 (03) : 397 - 407
  • [7] FE and skills in Scotland: the implications of a policy led and 'managed' approach?
    Gallacher, Jim
    Reeve, Fiona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK, 2019, 32 (03) : 238 - 250
  • [8] Implementing health and social care policy - England and Scotland compared
    Forbes, Tom
    Evans, Debbie
    Scott, Niccola
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES, 2010, 31 (06) : 591 - 611
  • [9] Vocational education teacher training in Scotland and England: policy and practice
    Avis, James
    Canning, Roy
    Fisher, Roy
    Morgan-Klein, Brenda
    Simmons, Robin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2011, 63 (02): : 115 - 127
  • [10] Special educational needs and competing policy frameworks in England and Scotland
    Riddell, S
    Adler, M
    Mordaunt, E
    Farmakopoulou, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 2000, 15 (06) : 621 - 635