An incremental approach to software process assessment and improvement

被引:4
|
作者
Gray, E [1 ]
Sampaio, A
Benediktsson, O
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Sch Comp & Math Sci, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Inst Super Engn Porto, Dept Informat Engn, P-4200 Oporto, Portugal
[3] Univ Iceland, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
software process improvement; software process assessment; SPICE; EFQM; improvement path;
D O I
10.1007/s11219-004-5258-7
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper considers assessment techniques based on the use of questionnaires, assessment matrices, workshops, and pro-forma assessment schemas; together with people issues such as motivation and involvement. With strong reference to SPICE process capability levels and the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence Model, the authors suggest a novel framework containing a possible sequence of improvement steps towards the Established Level 3. The main conclusion in this paper is that an incremental improvement path can be defined using process assessment that commences with questionnaires, then goes on to matrices, workshops, and finally reaches pro-formas. Furthermore, it seems quite plausible that all four types of assessment techniques should be employed on an ongoing basis in a staged fashion.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Incremental Approach to Software Process Assessment and Improvement
    Edwin Gray
    Alberto Sampaio
    Oddur Benediktsson
    [J]. Software Quality Journal, 2005, 13 : 7 - 16
  • [2] Incremental, collaborative software process improvement in a tiny software group
    Straub, P
    [J]. XXII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE CHILEAN COMPUTER SCIENCE SOCIETY, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 187 - 194
  • [3] Is my software process improvement suitable for incremental deployment?
    Krzanik, L
    Simila, J
    [J]. EIGHTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING PRACTICE INCORPORATING COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 76 - 87
  • [4] Software process assessment and improvement with BOOTSTRAP
    Stienen, H
    Engelmann, F
    [J]. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, 1996, 38 (06): : 609 - &
  • [5] The Usability Approach in Software Process Improvement
    Polgar, Peter Balazs
    Biro, Miklos
    [J]. SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, 2011, 172 : 133 - +
  • [6] Assessment Driven Process Modeling for Software Process Improvement
    Makinen, Timo
    Varkoi, Timo
    [J]. 2008 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1570 - 1575
  • [7] Software Process Management Assessment Towards CMM a Systematic Approach to Optimize Internal Process Improvement
    Belay, Gebeyehu G.
    He, Zhongshi
    Zou, Dongsheng
    [J]. SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING: THEORY AND PRACTICE, VOL 1, 2012, 114 : 499 - 505
  • [8] Bootstrap: A software process assessment and improvement methodology
    Simila, J
    Kuvaja, P
    Krzanik, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 1995, 5 (04) : 559 - 584
  • [9] Software process and product improvement: an empirical assessment
    Kuilboer, JP
    Ashrafi, N
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 42 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [10] Application themes of software process assessment and improvement
    Messnarz, Richard
    Sicilia, Miguel-Angel
    Biro, Miklos
    Garcia-Barriocanal, Elena
    Garre-Rubio, Miguel
    Siakas, Kerstin
    Clarke, Adrienne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2014, 26 (03) : 284 - 294