Gandhi Beyond Public Reason Liberalism

被引:0
|
作者
Patra, Karunakar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delhi, Dyal Singh Coll, Dept Polit Sci, New Delhi, India
关键词
Public reason; Liberal democracy; Gandhi; Rawls; Satyagraha; Conflict arbitration;
D O I
10.1007/s40961-021-00259-1
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Since contemporary societies are deeply multicultural and plural, the partisan ideological politics obviously animate conflict of opinions and hard bargains that brings coercion into play. Thus political power is exercised to establish legitimacy and stability in the polity. The use of public reason as a tool of public inquiry is considered as most effective in deciding upon the outcomes of laws and policies. The idea of public reason is one of the contemporary innovations of liberal thinking in democracy and has gained a wider currency among the political theorists after John Rawls adoption of it into his political thinking. On this background, my concern is to see the feasibility of public reason alone into democratic outcomes through coercive use of power provided that this is widely accepted among the epistemic peers in a democracy. I propose that the exclusiveness of public reason is inadequate to arbitrate on fundamental questions of politics in situations where disagreement becomes acute because of the adversary positions held by citizens. And hence love and truth add to the rigorousness of reason as strong ideals to combat an insurgency of deadly disagreements. It is an attempt to engage love and truth to public reason to make public deliberations more productive in the arena of law making and policy outputs. The strengthening of this democratic process is pioneering effort of M. K. Gandhi.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 444
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条