Juror decision-making regarding a defendant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder

被引:5
|
作者
Baker, James [1 ,2 ]
Edwards, Ian [3 ]
Beazley, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychol Therapies CPPT, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[2] Norfolk & Suffolk Mental Hlth Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ East Anglia, UEA Law Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
borderline personality disorder; BPD; diminished responsibility; juries; jury; mental health; mock jury; personality disorder; stigma; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; MENTAL-ILLNESS STIGMA; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS; SPECTRUM DISORDER; IMPACT; LAW; GENDER; PERCEPTIONS; CLINICIAN; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1080/13218719.2021.1938273
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Stigma is an established consequence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) diagnosis. This diagnosis is subject to revision in the International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision (ICD-11). Using the legal issue of diminished responsibility, this study applied an experimental mock-jury methodology to explore the impact of diagnostic stigma of BPD on jury decision-making. Participants were allocated to one of two versions of a simplified fictitious homicide trial. The group whose defendant was described as having a 'severe personality disorder, borderline pattern' rated the defendant as more dangerous, and more in need of segregation and coercive treatment, than controls where the defendant was described as having a 'complex mental health problem'. Between-group differences in other measures, including the decision to agree a verdict of diminished responsibility, were not found. The ICD-11 'severe personality disorder, borderline pattern' diagnosis may adversely impact the attitudes of jurors considering the question of diminished responsibility.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 534
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of defendant gender on juror decision-making
    McKimmie, B
    Campbell, E
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 56 : 79 - 80
  • [2] Risky decision-making in borderline personality disorder
    Svaldi, Jennifer
    Philipsen, Alexandra
    Matthies, Swantje
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2012, 197 (1-2) : 112 - 118
  • [3] Impaired decision-making in borderline personality disorder
    Bajzat, Bettina
    Soltesz, Peter
    Soltesz-Varhelyi, Klara
    Levay, Evelyn Erika
    Unoka, Zsolt Szabolcs
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [4] A Case of Culture: Defendant Gender and Juror Decision-Making
    Yamamoto, Susan
    Maeder, Evelyn M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2017, 32 (20) : 3090 - 3110
  • [5] The influence of defendant body size and defendant gender on mock juror decision-making
    Yamamoto, Susan
    Maeder, Evelyn M.
    Mossiere, Annik
    Brown, Dylan
    [J]. COGENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 6 (01):
  • [6] Medication decision-making by adults with borderline personality disorder
    Stephan, Alice
    Krawitz, Roy
    Jackson, Wendy
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 15 (05) : 385 - 389
  • [7] Borderline personality disorder and decision-making capacity.
    Lazaro, F. Garcia
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 65 : S666 - S667
  • [8] The effects of defendant attractiveness and stealing thunder on juror decision-making
    Cordell, JH
    Williams, K
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 54 : 20 - 20
  • [9] The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials
    Maeder, Evelyn M.
    Yamamoto, Susan
    McLaughlin, Kendra J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 68
  • [10] An exploration of mock juror experience during the deliberations of a defendant diagnosed with a personality disorder
    Wootton, Sophie
    Tkazky, Sophia
    Bergstrom, Henriette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PRACTICE, 2024, 26 (01) : 73 - 86