Central mechanisms of controlled-release metoprolol in migraine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

被引:33
|
作者
Siniatchkin, M. [1 ]
Andrasik, F.
Kropp, P.
Niederberger, U.
Strenge, H.
Averkina, N.
Lindner, V.
Stephani, U.
Gerber, W-D
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Neuropaediat Dept, Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ W Florida, Dept Psychol, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
[3] Univ Kiel, Dept Neurol, D-2300 Kiel, Germany
关键词
beta-Blockers; contingent negative variation; excitability; metoprolol; migraine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01377.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
beta-Blockers are widely used in the prophylaxis of migraine and have been described as very effective drugs in many studies. Some investigators have demonstrated that the clinical improvement of migraine corresponds to the normalization of the contingent negative variation (CNV), a slow cortical potential measuring cortical information processing. However, most of these studies have contained a variety of methodological pitfalls, which we attempted to address in the current study. Twenty patients suffering from migraine without aura were randomly divided into two groups. The groups were treated either with controlled-release metoprolol or placebo for 3 months, using a double-blind design. Twice before and once after each month of the treatment the CNV was recorded. After 3 months, a significant reduction of migraine frequency, duration and intensity was demonstrated for the metoprolol compared with the placebo group. The CNV was characterized by a marked reduction of the amplitude of the total CNV and postimperative negative variation and normalization of the eartly CNV habituation following treatment. Therefore, metoprolol may exert its prophylactic effect in migraine through the influence on cortical information processing and excitability represented by the CNV.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1032
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical efficacy and central mechanisms of cyclandelate in migraine: A double-blind placebo-controlled study
    Siniatchkin, M
    Gerber, WD
    Vein, A
    FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 1998, 13 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [2] Magnesium in the prophylaxis of migraine - A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Pfaffenrath, V
    Wessely, P
    Meyer, C
    Isler, HR
    Evers, S
    Grotemeyer, KH
    Taneri, Z
    Soyka, D
    Gobel, H
    Fischer, M
    CEPHALALGIA, 1996, 16 (06) : 436 - 440
  • [3] VERAPAMIL PROPHYLAXIS OF MIGRAINE - A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    SOLOMON, GD
    STEEL, JG
    SPACCAVENTO, LJ
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 250 (18): : 2500 - 2502
  • [4] Topiramate in migraine prevention: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Storey, JR
    Calder, CS
    Hart, DE
    Potter, DL
    HEADACHE, 2001, 41 (10): : 968 - 975
  • [5] A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Paroxetine Controlled-Release in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    Masand, Prakash S.
    Pae, Chi-Un
    Krulewicz, Stan
    Peindl, Kathleen
    Mannelli, Paolo
    Varia, Indu M.
    Patkar, Ashwin A.
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2009, 50 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [6] Montelukast for migraine prophylaxis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Brandes, JL
    Visser, WH
    Farmer, MV
    Schuhl, AL
    Malbecq, W
    Vrijens, F
    Lines, CR
    Reines, SA
    HEADACHE, 2004, 44 (06): : 581 - 586
  • [7] Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of homoeopathic prophylaxis of migraine
    Whitmarsh, TE
    ColestonShields, DM
    Steiner, TJ
    CEPHALALGIA, 1997, 17 (05) : 600 - 604
  • [8] Oxcarbazepine in migraine headache - A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
    Silberstein, S.
    Saper, J.
    Berenson, F.
    Somogyi, M.
    McCague, K.
    D'Souza, J.
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (07) : 548 - 555
  • [9] FLUNARIZINE IN MIGRAINE - A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY (IN A SAUDI POPULATION)
    ALDEEB, SM
    BIARY, N
    BAHOU, Y
    ALJABERI, M
    KHOJA, W
    HEADACHE, 1992, 32 (09): : 461 - 462
  • [10] A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PROPHYLACTIC STUDY OF FLUNARIZINE (SIBELIUM) IN MIGRAINE
    LOUIS, P
    HEADACHE, 1981, 21 (06): : 235 - 239