A randomised study of GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) versus agonist (busereline) for controlled ovarian stimulation: effect on safety and efficacy

被引:38
|
作者
Xavier, P [1 ]
Gamboa, C [1 ]
Calejo, L [1 ]
Silva, J [1 ]
Stevenson, D [1 ]
Nunes, A [1 ]
Martinez-de-Oliveira, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sao Joao, Fac Med Porto, Unidade Reprod Medicamente Assistida, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Oporto, Portugal
关键词
GnRH antagonist; agonist; controlled ovarian stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess safety and efficacy of cetrorelix utilisation in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Study design: Phase III, randomized, single center study of 131 patients undergoing COS and IVF with or without ICSI, in a University affiliated Hospital. Sixty-six patients were allocated to the protocol with antagonist and 65 to the agonist protocol arm. The Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney test and the chi-square test were applied as required, using SPSS for Windows (R) with a two-sided 5% significance level. Results: The mean (+/- S.D.) duration of stimulation was 9.5 +/- 1.7 days in the antagonist group and 10.6 +/- 2.1 days in the agonist group (P = 0.02). The mean (+/- S.D.) duration of suppression was 4.6 +/- 1.3 days in the antagonist group and 27.3 +/- 5.2 days in the agonist group (P < 0.0001). No significant differences were noted in other outcome measures: amount of rFSH required, estradiol level on hCG day, number of follicles >= 15 mm and endometrial thickness on oocyte retrival day, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate and number of OHS cases. Clinical pregnancy rates per-attempt and per-transfer were 15.1% and 17.0% in the antagonist group and 16.9% and 20.0% in the agonist group (P = 0.79 and 0.71, respectively). Conclusions: GnRH antagonists are an effective, safe and well tolerated alternative to agonists for COS. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 189
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix single dose protocol: A comparative study with GnRH agonist treatment.
    Olivennes, J
    Samama, M
    Kadoch, IJ
    Fanchin, R
    Righini, C
    Frydman, R
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S177 - S177
  • [2] BEYOND: a randomised controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of individualised follitropin delta dosing in GnRH agonist versus antagonist protocols for first ovarian stimulation cycle
    Sordal, T.
    Ekerhovd, E.
    Cohlen, B.
    Schenk, M.
    Larsson, P.
    Lobo, R.
    Pinton, P.
    Pinborg, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [3] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoing debate
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Patrizio, Pasquale
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2013, 26 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [4] Human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo:: effects of GnRH agonist versus antagonist (cetrorelix)
    Garcia-Velasco, JA
    Isaza, V
    Vidal, C
    Landazábal, A
    Remohí, J
    Simón, C
    Pellicer, A
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (12) : 2533 - 2539
  • [5] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Meltzer, Simion
    Rabinson, Jacob
    Zohav, Efraim
    Anteby, Eyal Y.
    Nahum, Ravit
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (04) : 1294 - 1296
  • [6] A randomised controlled trial comparing GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix with GnRH agonist Leuprorelin for endometrial thinning prior to transcervical resection of
    Bhatia, K.
    Doonan, Y.
    Giannakou, A.
    Bentick, B.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (10) : 1214 - 1224
  • [7] Comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols, GNRH agonist versus antagonist
    Cardoso, M. F. C. Fonseca
    Pinto, M. P.
    Cardoso, M. F. C. Fonseca
    Pinto, M. P.
    Cardoso, M. F. C. Fonseca
    Sousa, M. S.
    Oliveira, C. O.
    Barros, A. B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 21 : 62 - 62
  • [8] GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: has the ongoing debate resolved?
    Orvieto, Raoul
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 29 (05) : 647 - 649
  • [9] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY COMPARING A GNRH-ANTAGONIST VERSUS A GNRH-AGONIST SHORT PROTOCOL FOR OVARIAN STIMULATION IN PATIENTS REFERRED FOR IVF
    Gordts, S.
    Puttemans, P.
    Campo, R.
    Valkenburg, M.
    Gordts, S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S176 - S176
  • [10] A prospective randomised study comparing a GnRH-antagonist versus a GnRH-agonist short protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients referred for IVF
    Gordts, S.
    Van Turnhout, C.
    Campo, R.
    Puttemans, P.
    Valkenburg, M.
    Gordts, S.
    [J]. FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2012, 4 (02): : 82 - 87