Fraud in the new-issues market: Empirical evidence on securities class actions

被引：61

作者：

Bohn, J ^{[1
]}

Choi, S ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV CHICAGO,CHICAGO,IL 60637

来源：

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW | 1996年 / 144卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/3312595

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：903 / 982

页数：80

共 50 条

[1] THE NEW-ISSUES MARKET IS BATTERED BUT ALIVE
TRACY, EJ
[J]. FORTUNE, 1984, 109 (07) : 80 - 80
[2] THRESHOLD PREREQUISITES TO SECURITIES FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS
LEADER, JL
[J]. TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 1970, 48 (02) : 417 - 459
[3] The evidence on securities class actions
Choi, Stephen J.
[J]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 2004, 57 (05) : 1465 - +
[4] JURY CERTIFICATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS
Kayes, Thomas
[J]. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2013, 107 (04) : 1851 - 1880
[5] SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS MOVE NORTH: A DOCTRINAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS IN CANADA
Pritchard, A. C.
Sarra, Janis P.
[J]. ALBERTA LAW REVIEW, 2010, 47 (04) : 881 - 926
[6] Efficient market hypothesis and fraud on the market theory a new perspective for class actions
Jovanovic, Franck
Andreadakis, Stelios
Schinckus, Christophe
[J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2016, 38 : 177 - 190
[7] SECONDARY TRADING CRYPTO FRAUD AND THE PROPRIETY OF SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS
Patel, Menesh S.
[J]. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2023, 96 (06) : 1571 - 1628
[8] CONGRESS, THE SUPREME COURT, AND THE RISE OF SECURITIES-FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2019, 132 (03) : 1067 - 1088
[9] SEC Investigations and Securities Class Actions: An Empirical Comparison
Choi, Stephen J.
Pritchard, A. C.
[J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2016, 13 (01) : 27 - 49
[10] Markets as monitors: A proposal to replace class actions with exchanges as securities fraud enforcers
Pritchard, AC
[J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1999, 85 (06) : 925 - 1020

← 1 2 3 4 5 →