How does public-private collaboration reinvent? A comparative analysis of urban bicycle-sharing policy diffusion in China

被引:16
|
作者
Wang, Huanming [1 ]
Xiong, Wei [2 ]
Yang, Liuhua [2 ]
Zhu, Dajian [2 ]
Cheng, Zhe [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Publ Adm, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Public-private collaboration; Policy reinvention; Collaborative governance; Urban bicycle-sharing service; Policy diffusion; NETWORK GOVERNANCE; SOCIAL VALUE; PARTNERSHIPS; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; EVOLUTION; MODEL; STATE; PARTICIPATION; COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2019.102429
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The public-private collaboration process reinvents itself during policy diffusion. To reveal the cooperative-reinvention process, this study integrates theories of policy reinvention and collaborative governance to develop a framework outlining the interplay between initial conditions, learning, the reinvention process, the governance structure, and outcomes of reinvention. This study uses the framework to conduct an exploratory in-depth case study of Mobike urban bicycle-sharing service in China to examine such interplay. Findings showed that the combinations of leadership, formalization of cooperation mechanisms, and centralization of governance structure led to reinvent outcomes of institution innovation and content innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Multiple Pathways to Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Public Service Delivery: A Cross-City Comparison of Bicycle-Sharing Service in China
    Wang, Huanming
    Chen, Bin
    Xiong, Wei
    Yang, Liuhua
    Zhu, Dajian
    URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2019, : 474 - 488
  • [2] Public-private partnerships in the water sector in China: a comparative analysis
    Qian, Neng
    House, Schuyler
    Wu, Alfred M.
    Wu, Xun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 36 (04) : 631 - 650
  • [3] How does policy attention affect e-government performance? The role of resource allocation and public-private collaboration
    Pan, Taiting
    Fan, Bo
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2024, 90 (02) : 369 - 384
  • [4] Spatial diffusion of public-private partnership (PPP) in China: A county-level analysis
    Qin, Shikun
    Kong, Hui
    Zhao, Jerry Zhirong
    CITIES, 2024, 147
  • [5] How Does Policy Implementation Affect the Sustainability of Public-Private Partnership Projects? A Stakeholder-Based Framework
    Xue, Bin
    Cen, Jun
    Liu, Bingsheng
    Qian, Lei
    Yuan, Jingfeng
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 45 (05) : 1029 - 1065
  • [6] Bankruptcy policy and surface transportation public-private partnerships: A comparative analysis of the U.S. and Europe
    Bolanos, Lisardo
    Gifford, Jonathan
    Kweun, Jeong Yun
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 7 (02) : 185 - 195
  • [7] Assessment of Critical Diffusion Factors of Public-Private Partnership and Social Policy: Evidence from Mainland Prefecture-Level Cities in China
    Li, Xiaohan
    Lv, Yang
    Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam
    Zeng, Xun
    LAND, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [8] Social Factors Influencing the Choice of Bicycle: Difference Analysis among Private Bike, Public Bike Sharing and Free-Floating Bike Sharing in Kunming, China
    Li, Xuefeng
    Zhang, Yong
    Du, Mingyang
    Yang, Jingzong
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 (05) : 2339 - 2348
  • [9] Social Factors Influencing the Choice of Bicycle: Difference Analysis among Private Bike, Public Bike Sharing and Free-Floating Bike Sharing in Kunming, China
    Xuefeng Li
    Yong Zhang
    Mingyang Du
    Jingzong Yang
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23 : 2339 - 2348
  • [10] How to foster entrepreneurship by government public policy: A comparative analysis between China, EU and USA
    Chen Tie-jun
    Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Public Administration, 2006, : 477 - 483