Meta-analysis of stent-assisted coiling versus coiling-only for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

被引:107
|
作者
Phan, Kevin [1 ,2 ]
Huo, Ya R. [3 ]
Jia, Fangzhi [1 ,4 ]
Phan, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Rao, Prashanth J. [1 ,3 ]
Mobbs, Ralph J. [1 ,3 ]
Mortimer, Alex M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Private Hosp, NeuroSpine Surg Res Grp NSURG, Level 7,Barker St, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] UNSW, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] North Bristol NHS Trust, Dept Neuroradiol, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Coiling; Endovascular; Intracranial aneurysm; Meta-analysis; Review stent-assisted; ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT; EFFICACY; SAFETY; NEUROFORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.035
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Endovascular coil embolization is a widely accepted and useful treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms. However, the principal limitation of this technique is the high aneurysm recurrence. The adjunct use of stents for coil embolization procedures has revolutionized the field of endovascular aneurysm management, however its safety and efficacy remains unclear. Two independent reviewers searched six databases from inception to July 2015 for trials that reported outcomes according to those who received stent-assisted coiling versus coiling-only (no stent-assistance). There were 14 observational studies involving 2698 stent-assisted coiling and 29,388 coiling-only patients. The pooled immediate occlusion rate for stent-assisted coiling was 57.7% (range: 20.2%-89.2%) and 48.7% (range: 31.7%-89.2%) for coiling-only, with no significant difference between the two (odds ratio [OR) = 1.01; 95% confidence intervals [CI}: 0.68-1.49). However, progressive thrombosis was significantly more likely in stent-assisted coiling (29.9%) compared to coiling-only (17.5%) (OR = 2.71; 95% CI: 1.95-3.75). Aneurysm recurrence was significantly lower in stent-assisted coiling (12.7%) compared to coiling-only (27.9%) (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.28-0.66). In terms of complications, there was no significant difference between the two techniques for all-complications, permanent complications or thrombotic complications. Mortality was significantly higher in the stent-assisted group 1.4% (range: 0%-27.5%) compared to the coiling-only group 0.2% (range: 0%-19.7%) (OR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.33-3.52). Based on limited evidence, stent-assisted coiling shows similar immediate occlusion rates, improved progressive thrombosis and decreased aneurysm recurrence compared to coiling-only, but is associated with a higher mortality rate. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted to clarify the safety of stent-associated coiling. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coil Placement and Coiling-Only for the Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Liu, Yongsheng
    Wang, Feng
    Wang, Mingyi
    Zhang, Guogdong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2017, 23 : 5697 - 5704
  • [2] Stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling in the management of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Wang, Fei
    Chen, Xun
    Wang, Yong
    Bai, Peng
    Wang, Huan-zhi
    Sun, Tao
    Yu, Hua-lin
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 364 : 160 - 166
  • [3] Stent-assisted Coiling of Complex Intracranial Aneurysms
    Deng, Dongfeng
    Sun, Hui
    Jin, Dianshi
    Qu, Kai
    Zhou, Jinbin
    Piao, Xiangyu
    Cai, Ming
    Zhang, Yanli
    Sun, Ruitan
    NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY, 2012, 22 (03) : 153 - 158
  • [4] Flow diverter versus stent-assisted coiling treatment for managing dissecting intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Brenner, Leonardo O.
    Prestes, Milena Zadra
    Soares, Cid
    Romeiro, Pedro
    Gomez, Victor A.
    Rabelo, Nicollas Nunes
    Welling, Leonardo C.
    Koester, Stefan W.
    Pinheiro, Agostinho C.
    Batista, Savio
    Bertani, Raphael
    Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
    Cavalcanti, Daniel Dutra
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [5] Stent-Assisted Coiling versus Coiling in Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis
    Hong, Yuan
    Wang, Yong-Jie
    Deng, Zheng
    Wu, Qun
    Zhang, Jian-Min
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [6] The Prophylactic Use of Tirofiban versus Oral Antiplatelet Medications in Stent-Assisted Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-analysis
    Xiang, Y.
    Zhao, H.
    Ding, C.
    Chen, H.
    Wang, D.
    Liu, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (04) : 713 - 719
  • [7] Propensity score-adjusted analysis on stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone for ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Goertz, Lukas
    Liebig, Thomas
    Pennig, Lenhard
    Timmer, Marco
    Styczen, Hanna
    Grunz, Jan-Peter
    Lichtenstein, Thorsten
    Schlamann, Marc
    Kabbasch, Christoph
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [8] Propensity score-adjusted analysis on stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone for ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Lukas Goertz
    Thomas Liebig
    Lenhard Pennig
    Marco Timmer
    Hanna Styczen
    Jan-Peter Grunz
    Thorsten Lichtenstein
    Marc Schlamann
    Christoph Kabbasch
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [9] Stent assisted coiling versus non-stent assisted coiling for the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Zhang, Xiaoxi
    Zuo, Qiao
    Tang, Haishuang
    Xue, Gaici
    Yang, Pengfei
    Zhao, Rui
    Li, Qiang
    Fang, Yibin
    Xu, Yi
    Hong, Bo
    Huang, Qinghai
    Liu, Jianmin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2019, 11 (05) : 489 - 496
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of Stent-Assisted Versus Non-Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Management of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ma, Yu-Hu
    He, Yong-Lin
    Zhang, Xiao-Yue
    Shang, Rui
    Hu, Hai-Tao
    Wang, Ting
    Lin, Sen
    Pan, Ya-Wen
    Zhang, Chang-Wei
    TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH, 2024,