Flow coupling effects in jet-in-crossflow flowfields

被引:8
|
作者
Bain, DB [1 ]
Smith, CE
Liscinsky, DS
Holdeman, JD
机构
[1] CFD Res Corp, Huntsville, AL 35805 USA
[2] United Technol Res Ctr, Combust Technol Grp, E Hartford, CT 06108 USA
[3] NASA, Lewis Res Ctr, Turbomachinery & Propuls Syst Div, Cleveland, OH 44135 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2514/2.5411
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The combustor designer is typically required to design liner orifices that effectively mix airjets with crossflow effluent. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) combustor analysis is typically used in the design process; however, the jets are usually assumed to enter the combustor with a uniform velocity and turbulence profile. The jet-mainstream flow coupling is usually neglected because of the computational expense. This study was performed to understand the effect of jet and mainstream how coupling, and to investigate jet boundary conditions that are commonly used in combustor internal calculations. A case representative of a plenum-fed quick-mix section of a rich burn/quick mix/lean burn combustor, i.e,, a jet to mainstream mass-how ratio of about 3 and a jet to mainstream momentum-flux ratio of about 30, was investigated. This case showed that the jet velocity entering the combustor nas very nonuniform, with a low normal velocity at the leading edge of the orifice and a high normal velocity at the trailing edge of the orifice, Three different combustor-only cases were analyzed, each with a uniform inlet jet profile. None of the cases matched the plenum-fed calculations. To assess liner thickness effects, a thin-walled case was also analyzed. The CFD analysis shelved the thin-walled jets had more penetration than the thick-walled jets.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Characterisation of wall flow topology in jet-in-crossflow interaction
    Kwon, EY
    Chocinski, D
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 106 (1061): : 393 - 398
  • [3] Unsteady Simulation of a jet-in-crossflow
    Hsu, AT
    Guo, Y
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2000, 14 (01) : 41 - 53
  • [4] Flow-Independent Liquid Jet-in-Crossflow Injection Using Physical Obstructions
    Clark, Charles R.
    Tonarely, Michael E.
    Morales, Anthony J.
    Reyes, Jonathan
    Ahmed, Kareem
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (10):
  • [5] Experimental investigation of the mixing processes in a Jet-in-Crossflow arrangement
    Cárdenas, Camilo
    Suntz, Rainer
    Bockhorn, Henning
    Gaswaerme International, 2008, 57 (05): : 337 - 342
  • [6] Effectiveness of Central Swirlers in the Thermal Uniformity of Jet-in-Crossflow Mixing
    Elgammal, Tarek
    Amano, Ryoichi S.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (10):
  • [7] The effect of Schmidt number on turbulent scalar mixing in a jet-in-crossflow
    He, GB
    Guo, YH
    Hsu, AT
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1999, 42 (20) : 3727 - 3738
  • [8] Validation of Calibrated k-ε Model Parameters for Jet-in-Crossflow
    Miller, Nathan E.
    Beresh, Steven J.
    Ray, Jaideep
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (08) : 4699 - 4713
  • [9] Robust Bayesian Calibration of a k - ε Model for Compressible Jet-in-Crossflow Simulations
    Ray, Jaideep
    Dechant, Lawrence
    Lefantzi, Sophia
    Ling, Julia
    Arunajatesan, Srinivasan
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2018, 56 (12) : 4893 - 4909
  • [10] UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS AND DATA-DRIVEN MODEL ADVANCES FOR A JET-IN-CROSSFLOW
    Ling, Julia
    Ruiz, Anthony
    Lacaze, Guilhem
    Oefelein, Joseph
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 5C, 2016,