PET image reconstruction: A robust state space approach

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, HF [1 ]
Tian, Y
Shi, PC
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Modern Opt Instrumentat, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Med Image Comp Grp, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms have shown improved image quality over conventional nonstatistical methods in PET by using accurate system response models and measurement noise models. Strictly speaking, however, PET measurements, pre-corrected for accidental coincidences, are neither Poisson nor Gaussian distributed and thus do not meet basic assumptions of these algorithms. In addition, the difficulty in determining the proper system response model also greatly affects the quality of the reconstructed images. In this paper, we explore the usage of state space principles for the estimation of activity map in tomographic PET imaging. The proposed strategy formulates the organ activity distribution through tracer kinetics models, and the photon-counting measurements through observation equations, thus makes it possible to unify the dynamic reconstruction problem and static reconstruction problem into a general framework. Further, it coherently treats the uncertainties of the statistical model of the imaging system and the noisy nature of measurement data. Since H. filter seeks minimum-maximum-error estimates without any assumptions on the system and data noise statistics, it is particular suited for PET image reconstruction where the statistical properties of measurement data and the system model are very complicated. The performance of the proposed framework is evaluated using Shepp-Logan simulated phantom data and real phantom data with favorable results.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 209
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A robust state-space kinetics-guided framework for dynamic PET image reconstruction
    Tong, S.
    Alessio, A. M.
    Kinahan, P. E.
    Liu, H.
    Shi, P.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (08): : 2481 - 2498
  • [2] ELASTOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION: A STOCHASTIC STATE SPACE APPROACH
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Heye
    Lu, Minhua
    Liu, Huafeng
    Hu, Zhenghui
    [J]. 2011 18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2011,
  • [3] State-space reconstruction of pet parametric maps
    Liu, Huafeng
    Jiang, Xiaona
    Shi, Pengcheng
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, ICIP 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 893 - +
  • [4] A new state-space approach for super-resolution image sequence reconstruction
    Tian, J
    Ma, KK
    [J]. 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 517 - 520
  • [5] Total variation regularization in measurement and image space for PET reconstruction
    Burger, M.
    Mueller, J.
    Papoutsellis, E.
    Schoenlieb, C. B.
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (10)
  • [6] Direct 3D PET Image Reconstruction into MR Image Space
    Gravel, Paul
    Verhaeghe, Jeroen
    Reader, Andrew J.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2011, : 3955 - 3962
  • [7] PET Image Reconstruction With Kernel and Kernel Space Composite Regularizer
    Guo, Shiyao
    Sheng, Yuxia
    Chai, Li
    Zhang, Jingxin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 42 (06) : 1786 - 1798
  • [8] Robust Framework for PET Image Reconstruction Incorporating System and Measurement Uncertainties
    Liu, Huafeng
    Wang, Song
    Gao, Fei
    Tian, Yi
    Chen, Wufan
    Hu, Zhenghui
    Shi, Pengcheng
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03):
  • [9] A state space approach to robust adaptive beamforming
    El-Keyi, Amr
    Kirubarajan, Thia
    Gershman, Alex B.
    [J]. 2005 IEEE/SP 13th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing (SSP), Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 243 - 248
  • [10] A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH TO FEATURE SPACE SELECTION FOR ROBUST MICRO-ENDOSCOPIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION
    Bourdon, Pascal
    Helbert, David
    [J]. 2017 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2017, : 2239 - 2243