共 50 条
Investigation of clinical effects of high- and low-resistance training for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized control-led trial
被引:169
|作者:
Jan, Mei-Hwa
[2
,3
]
Lin, Jiu-Jeng
[2
]
Liau, Jiann-Jong
[2
]
Lin, Yeong-Fwu
Lin, Da-Hon
[1
]
机构:
[1] En Chu Kong Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch & Grad Inst Phys Therapy, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
来源:
关键词:
D O I:
10.2522/ptj.20060300
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background and Purpose Muscle strength training is important for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). High-resistance exercise has been demonstrated to be more beneficial than low-resistance exercise for young subjects. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of high- and low-resistance strength training in elderly subjects with knee OA. Subjects and Methods One hundred two subjects were randomly assigned to groups that received 8 weeks of high-resistance exercise (HR group), 8 weeks of low-resistance exercise (LR group), or no exercise (control group). Pain, function, walking time, and muscle torque were examined before and after intervention. Results Significant improvement for all measures was observed in both exercise groups. There was no significant difference in any measures between HR and LR groups. However, based on effect size between exercise and control groups, the HR group improved more than the LR group. Discussion and Conclusion Both high- and low-resistance strength training significantly improved clinical effects in this study. The effects of high-resistance strength training appear to be larger than those of low-resistance strength training for people with mild to moderate knee OA, although the differences between the HR and LR groups were not statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 436
页数:10
相关论文