QUINT: A tool to detect qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions in randomized controlled trials

被引:9
|
作者
Doove, Lisa L. [1 ]
Van Deun, Katrijn [1 ,2 ]
Dusseldorp, Elise [1 ,3 ]
Van Mechelen, Iven [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Psychol & Educ Sci, Tiensestr 102 Bus 3713, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Math Inst, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
qualitative interaction; subgroup analysis; treatment efficacy; QUINT; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1080/10503307.2015.1062934
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: The detection of subgroups involved in qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions (i.e., for one subgroup of clients treatment A outperforms treatment B, whereas for another the reverse holds true) is crucial for personalized health. In typical Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), the combination of a lack of a priori hypotheses and a large number of possible moderators leaves current methods insufficient to detect subgroups involved in such interactions. A recently developed method, QUalitative INteraction Trees (QUINT), offers a solution. However, the paper in which QUINT has been introduced is not easily accessible for non-methodologists. In this paper, we want to review the conceptual basis of QUINT in a nontechnical way, and illustrate its relevance for psychological applications. Method: We present a concise introduction into QUINT along with a summary of available evidence on its performance. Subsequently, we subject RCT data on the effect of motivational interviewing in a treatment for substance abuse disorders to a reanalysis with QUINT. As outcome variables, we focus on measures of retention and substance use. Results: A qualitative treatment-subgroup interaction is found for retention. By contrast, no qualitative interaction is detected for substance use. Conclusions: QUINT may lead to insightful and well-interpretable results with straightforward implications for personalized treatment assignment.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 622
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions
    Dusseldorp, Elise
    Van Mechelen, Iven
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (02) : 219 - 237
  • [2] Qualitative Treatment-Subgroup Interactions in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Treatments for Adolescents with ADHD: Exploring What Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Works for Whom
    Boyer, Bianca E.
    Doove, Lisa L.
    Geurts, Hilde M.
    Prins, Pier J. M.
    Van Mechelen, Iven
    Van der Oord, Saskia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [3] Comparing internal and external validation in the discovery of qualitative treatment-subgroup effects using two small clinical trials
    Olsen, Maren K.
    Stechuchak, Karen M.
    Steinhauser, Karen E.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 15
  • [4] STANDARDIZATION FOR SUBGROUP ANALYSIS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Varadhan, Ravi
    Wang, Sue-Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (01) : 154 - 167
  • [5] Prespecification of subgroup analyses and examination of treatment-subgroup interactions in cancer individual participant data meta-analyses are suboptimal
    Gao, Ya
    Liu, Ming
    Shi, Shuzhen
    Niu, Mingming
    Li, Jiang
    Zhang, Junhua
    Song, Fujian
    Tian, Jinhui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 138 : 156 - 167
  • [6] Subgroup analysis in randomized controlled trials: Useful or misleading?
    Tritschler, Tobias
    Sadeghipour, Parham
    Bikdeli, Behnood
    [J]. THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2023, 232 : 160 - 162
  • [7] Subgroup analyses in randomized controlled trials frequently categorized continuous subgroup information
    Williamson, S. Faye
    Grayling, Michael J.
    Mander, Adrian P.
    Noor, Nurulamin M.
    Savage, Joshua S.
    Yap, Christina
    Wason, James M. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 150 : 72 - 79
  • [8] A comparison of five recursive partitioning methods to find person subgroups involved in meaningful treatment-subgroup interactions
    Doove, L. L.
    Dusseldorp, E.
    Van Deun, K.
    Van Mechelen, I.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION, 2014, 8 (04) : 403 - 425
  • [9] A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology
    Ah-See, KW
    Molony, NC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1998, 112 (05): : 460 - 463
  • [10] Detecting treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered data with generalized linear mixed-effects model trees
    Fokkema, M.
    Smits, N.
    Zeileis, A.
    Hothorn, T.
    Kelderman, H.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (05) : 2016 - 2034