Distractor Suppression When Attention Fails: Behavioral Evidence for a Flexible Selective Attention Mechanism

被引:7
|
作者
Elliott, James C. [1 ]
Giesbrecht, Barry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Inst Collaborat Biotechnol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; SPATIAL ATTENTION; BLINK; LOCUS; LOAD; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0126203
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Despite consistent evidence showing that attention is a multifaceted mechanism that can operate at multiple levels of processing depending on the structure and demands of the task, investigations of the attentional blink phenomenon have consistently shown that the impairment in reporting the second of two targets typically occurs at a late, or post-perceptual, stage of processing. This suggests that the attentional blink phenomenon may represent the operation of a unique attentional mechanism that is not as flexible as other attentional mechanisms. To test whether the attentional blink is a fixed or flexible phenomenon, we manipulated first target task demands (i.e., difficulty) and measured the influence this had on processing a subsequently presented distractor and the second target. If the attentional blink represents a mechanism that is fixed and consistently fails at a single stage of processing, then manipulations of task difficulty should not affect distractor processing. However, if the attentional blink represents a more multifaceted and flexible mechanism, then task difficulty should modulate distractor processing. The results revealed that distractor processing during the AB was attenuated under high task difficulty. In addition, unlike previous studies, we failed to find a correlation between distractor processing and the severity of the attentional blink. Using a simulation, we demonstrate that the previously reported correlations may have been spurious and due to using variables that were not independent. Overall, the present results support the conclusion that the selectivity of attention during the AB is flexible and depends on the structure and demands of the task.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selective attention in reaching: when is an object not a distractor?
    Tresilian, JR
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1999, 3 (11) : 407 - 408
  • [2] Distractor probability influences suppression in auditory selective attention
    Daly, Heather R.
    Pitt, Mark A.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2021, 216
  • [3] Selective attention in reaching: when is an object not a distractor? Reply
    Castiello, U
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1999, 3 (11) : 408 - 408
  • [4] Focal Suppression of Distractor Sounds by Selective Attention in Auditory Cortex
    Schwartz, Zachary P.
    David, Stephen V.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2018, 28 (01) : 323 - 339
  • [5] Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention
    Tong, Yunxia
    Melara, Robert D.
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1166 : 110 - 123
  • [6] ERP and behavioral effects of distractor variability on auditory selective attention
    Tong, Y
    Melara, RD
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 37 : S98 - S98
  • [7] Scarcity mindset impairs distractor suppression but not target enhancement in selective attention: Evidence from ERPs
    Zhang, Lijie
    Xu, Mengsi
    Du, Xiaoli
    Yang, Qian
    Qiao, Lei
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2023, 191
  • [8] The effect of attention to distractor on inhibitory processes in selective attention
    GENG Haiyan1
    2. Department of psychology
    [J]. Science Bulletin, 2005, (16) : 73 - 80
  • [9] The effect of attention to distractor on inhibitory processes in selective attention
    Geng, HY
    Song, QL
    Li, YF
    Zhu, Y
    [J]. CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2005, 50 (16): : 1743 - 1750
  • [10] Social exclusion impairs distractor suppression but not target enhancement in selective attention
    Xu, Mengsi
    Li, Zhiai
    Diao, Liuting
    Fan, Lingxia
    Zhang, Lijie
    Yuan, Shuge
    Yang, Dong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 121 : 72 - 79