Examining Clinical Practice Guidelines for Male Circumcision: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal Using AGREE II

Objective To identify and critically appraise available clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) targeting male circumcision using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Study design A literature search was conducted using electronic databases, CPG databases, and national/international societies providing recommendations to guide clinical decision making for male circumcision. We selected pediatric-focused CPGs related to male circumcision published between January 2010 and December 2020. Non-English CPGs and publications involving narrative reviews, primary research, training manuals, patient and allied health professional guidelines, and technical guides were excluded from our search. Complete CPG documents (including full-text articles, supplemental documents, and associated information) were reviewed. Quality appraisal of CPGs was conducted in accordance with the AGREE II manual. Results A total of 163 CPGs were identified, of which 93 were screened and 13 were reviewed. All AGREE II domains demonstrated good to excellent interrater reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) to 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95). Most CPGs performed satisfactorily in the clarity of presentation domain and performed poorly in the applicability and editorial independence domains. The top 3 CPGs identified were those of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Canadian Urological Association. Consistencies among the CPGs were demonstrated across most recommendations. Conclusions Current CPGs are of variable quality, and our findings should be taken into consideration by clinicians and health care professionals when selecting appropriate guidelines for male circumcision.