Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth - A retrospective evaluation

被引:51
|
作者
Croll, TP
Bar-Zion, V
Segura, A
Donly, KJ
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent,Predoctoral Program, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Dent Med, Dept Pediat Dent, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dent Branch, Houston, TX 77225 USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent,Postdoctoral Program, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0336
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background. The authors retrospectively evaluated the clinical performance of one resin-modified glass ionomer cas a restorative material in Class I, Class II, Class HI and Class V restorations in primary teeth. Methods. A total of 306 patients who had received a total of 864 resin-modified glass ionomer restorations, which had been in their mouths for a minimum of three years, were included in this evaluation. The authors assessed the clinical observations recorded in patients' records and used bitewing radiographs to assess Class II restorations. Results. The authors found an overall restoration success rate of 93.0 percent, with Class I restorations having a 92.6 percent success rate, Class II restorations having a 93.3 percent success rate, Class III restorations having a 100 percent success rate, and Class V restorations having a 98.0 percent success rate. Conclusions. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement functioned well as a Class I Class II, Class II and Class V restorative Clinical implications. Resin-modified glass ionomer a durable and reliable material to use for Class I Class II, Class III and Class V restorations in primary teeth., Therefore, dentists have a proven alternative to silver amalgam and resin-based composite for primary tooth restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1116
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars
    Folkesson, UH
    Andersson-Wenckert, IE
    van Dijken, JWV
    [J]. SWEDISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1999, 23 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [2] Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified - Glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations
    Donly, KJ
    Segura, A
    Kanellis, M
    Erickson, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 130 (10): : 1459 - 1466
  • [3] Clinical evaluations of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations
    Sidhu, Sharanbir K.
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2010, 26 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [4] Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results
    Qvist, V
    Manscher, E
    Teglers, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (04) : 285 - 294
  • [5] Conventional and resin modified glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth
    Qvist, V
    Teglers, PT
    Manscher, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 611 - 611
  • [6] Clinical evaluation of a conventional versus a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Avila, G
    Navarro, MFD
    Palma, RG
    Franco, EB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 381 - 381
  • [7] Solubility of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement
    Quackenbush, BM
    Donly, KJ
    Croll, TP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1998, 65 (05): : 310 - +
  • [8] Two-year clinical performance in primary teeth of nano-filled versus conventional resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations
    Abo-Hamar, Sahar E.
    El-Desouky, Shaimaa S.
    Abu Hamila, Nahed A.
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (05): : 381 - 388
  • [9] Clinical and SEM evaluation of modified glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth.
    Vieira, R
    Schmitz, C
    Almeida, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A140 - A140
  • [10] Short-term Clinical Evaluation of a Resin-modified Glass ionomer Luting Cement
    Yoneda, S.
    Morigami, M.
    Sugizaki, J.
    Yamada, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 26 (03) : 210 - 210