Plant invaders outperform congeneric natives on amino acids

被引:3
|
作者
Yu, Hong-Wei [1 ]
He, Wei-Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, State Key Lab Vegetat & Environm Change, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biomass allocation; Congeneric comparison; Growth advantage; Nitrogen forms; Nitrogen use efficiency; ORGANIC-NITROGEN; SOIL MICROBES; INVASION; MICROORGANISMS; AVAILABILITY; COMPETITION; HYPOTHESES; ALLOCATION; MECHANISMS; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.baae.2021.04.009
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
As a key nitrogen (N) source, soil amino acids play an important role in plant N nutrition. However, how amino acids differentially influence the N use strategies of native and invasive plants remains unclear. We performed a potted experiment using five pairs of native and invasive plant congeners, which were subject to 23 N treatments (i.e., 20 protein primary amino acids, nitrate, ammonium, and control), each with 10 replicates. We determined their growth, biomass allocation, N use efficiency, and the growth advantage of plant invaders over their natives. Native and invasive plants used the same 18 amino acid N sources (i.e., a similar amino acid economics spectrum). The growth of plant invaders was invariably better than the growth of native plants, and this superior growth of invaders was linked to their higher root biomass allocation and greater N use effi- ciency. Additionally, invasive plants had a greater growth advantage on amino acid N than on inorganic N, so was this advantage greater on neutral amino acids than on acidic amino acids. These findings suggest that the differences in amino acid use strategies between invasive and native congeners could help to explain plant invasiveness, as indicated by a growth advantage. (C) 2021 Gesellschaft fur Okologie. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 84
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of nutrient acquisition in exotic plant species and congeneric natives
    Meisner, Annelein
    de Boer, Wietse
    Verhoeven, Koen J. F.
    Boschker, Henricus T. S.
    van der Putten, Wim H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2011, 99 (06) : 1308 - 1315
  • [2] Invaders today, natives tomorrow?
    Young, AM
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5441) : 901 - 901
  • [3] Asymmetric climate warming does not benefit plant invaders more than natives
    He, Zheng-Sheng
    He, Wei-Ming
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 742
  • [4] Spatial Segregation of Congeneric Invaders in Central Pennsylvania, USA
    Michael R. Allen
    Katriona Shea
    [J]. Biological Invasions, 2006, 8 : 509 - 521
  • [5] Spatial segregation of congeneric invaders in central Pennsylvania, USA
    Allen, MR
    Shea, K
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2006, 8 (03) : 509 - 521
  • [6] Extended consequences of selection by exotic invaders on natives
    Atwater, Daniel Z.
    Callaway, Ragan M.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2022, 233 (02) : 588 - 591
  • [7] Interspecific differences in nematode control between range-expanding plant species and their congeneric natives
    Wilschut, R. A.
    Geisen, S.
    ten Hooven, F. C.
    van der Putten, W. H.
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 100 : 233 - 241
  • [8] Plant amino acids
    B. Singh
    [J]. Amino Acids, 2006, 30 : 111 - 111
  • [9] Plant amino acids
    Singh, B
    [J]. AMINO ACIDS, 2006, 30 (02) : 111 - 111
  • [10] Seed size-number trade-offs are absent in the introduced range for three congeneric plant invaders
    Bufford, Jennifer L.
    Hulme, Philip E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2021, 109 (11) : 3849 - 3860