Distinctions between autobiographical memory specificity and detail: Trajectories across cue presentations

被引:9
|
作者
Roberts, John E. [1 ]
Yanes-Lukin, Paula [1 ]
Kyung, Yoonhee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
Autobiographical memory; Memory specificity; Memory detail; Overgeneral memory; Emotion; SELF; BINDING; DEPRESSION; MOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Autobiographical memory is central to identity and self-awareness, but individuals with depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder tend to have overgeneral memories. Recent research has suggested that the ability to retrieve specific memories and individual differences in the amount of detail in specific memories are independent (Kyung, Yanes-Lukin, & Roberts, 2016). We re-analyzed data from Kyung et al. to test whether these constructs are distinct in terms of their trajectories over cue presentations. Results indicated a U-shaped trajectory for specificity, but a inverted-U trajectory for detail, suggesting a dissociation in which periods of decreasing probability of retrieving specific memories correspond to increasing amounts of detail. Further, trajectories had similar forms when memories included emotional content, but differed for recollections that did not include emotional content. Finally, at the individual level, slopes for specificity and detail across trials were uncorrelated. These findings provide further support for the independence of these constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 351
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Response styles to sad mood and self-esteem as predictors of autobiographical memory: Distinctions between memory specificity and detail
    Roberts, John E.
    Kyung, Yoonhee
    Koscinski, Brandon
    Rosenfeld, Eve
    Lee, Hoon-Jin
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 169
  • [2] Specificity and detail in autobiographical memory: Same or different constructs?
    Kyung, Yoonhee
    Yanes-Lukin, Paula
    Roberts, John E.
    [J]. MEMORY, 2016, 24 (02) : 272 - 284
  • [3] Effects of instructions and cue subjectiveness on specificity of autobiographical memory recall
    Ricarte-Trives, Jorge J.
    Latorre-Postigo, Jose M.
    Ros-Segura, Laura
    [J]. ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2014, 30 (03): : 1129 - 1136
  • [4] Specificity and detail in autobiographical memory retrieval: a multi-site (re)investigation
    Hallford, David J.
    Barry, Tom J.
    Belmans, Eline
    Raes, Filip
    Dax, Samantha
    Nishiguchi, Yuki
    Takano, Keisuke
    [J]. MEMORY, 2021, 29 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [5] Autobiographical memory specificity across life periods in people with schizophrenia
    Nieto, Marta
    Miguel Latorre, Jose
    Arantzazu Garcia-Rico, Maria
    Vicente Hernandez-Viadel, Jose
    Ros, Laura
    Javier Ricarte, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 75 (06) : 1011 - 1021
  • [6] MATCH BETWEEN CUE AND MEMORY VALENCE DURING AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY RECALL IN DEPRESSION
    Young, Kymberly D.
    Erickson, Kristine
    Drevets, Wayne C.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2012, 111 (01) : 129 - 148
  • [7] A Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Cue Valence on Overgeneral Memory and Autobiographical Memory Specificity Among Youth
    Tracy Preko
    Katherine Edler
    Brigid Behrens
    Kristin Valentino
    [J]. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 2023, 51 : 1683 - 1698
  • [8] A Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Cue Valence on Overgeneral Memory and Autobiographical Memory Specificity Among Youth
    Preko, Tracy
    Edler, Katherine
    Behrens, Brigid
    Valentino, Kristin
    [J]. RESEARCH ON CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2023, 51 (11): : 1683 - 1698
  • [9] Effects of self-relevant cues and cue valence on autobiographical memory specificity in dysphoria
    Matsumoto, Noboru
    Mochizuki, Satoshi
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2017, 31 (03) : 607 - 615
  • [10] The autobiographical memory test: Differences in memory specificity across three recall elicitation methods
    Bunnell, Sarah L.
    Legerski, John-Paul
    Herting, Nicola Rodwell
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 39 (06) : 2298 - 2305