Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy

被引:106
|
作者
Lasevicius, Thiago [1 ,2 ]
Ugrinowitsch, Carlos [2 ]
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon [3 ]
Roschel, Hamilton [2 ]
Tavares, Lucas Duarte [1 ,2 ]
De Souza, Eduardo Oliveira [4 ]
Laurentino, Gilberto [2 ]
Tricoli, Valmor [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ibirapuera, Dept Hlth Sci, C Av Interlagos 132, BR-04661100 Chacara Flora Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Phys Educ & Sport, Dept Sport, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] CUNY Lehman Coll, Dept Hlth Sci, Bronx, NY USA
[4] Univ Tampa, Dept Hlth Sci & Human Performance, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
关键词
Low-load; high-load; volume of training; muscle size; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; TONIC FORCE GENERATION; MUSCULAR ADAPTATIONS; SLOW MOVEMENT; EXERCISE; YOUNG; SPECIFICITY; VELOCITY; METAANALYSIS; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1080/17461391.2018.1450898
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The present study investigated the effects of different intensities of resistance training (RT) on elbow flexion and leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Thirty men volunteered to participate in an RT programme, performed twice a week for 12 weeks. The study employed a within-subject design, in which one leg and arm trained at 20% 1RM (G20) and the contralateral limb was randomly assigned to one of the three conditions: 40% (G40); 60% (G60), and 80% 1RM (G80). The G20 started RT session with three sets to failure. After G20 training, the number of sets was adjusted for the other contralateral limb conditions with volume-matched. CSA and 1RM were assessed at pre, post-6 weeks, and post-12 weeks. There was time effect for CSA for the vastus lateralis (VL) (8.9%, 20.5%, 20.4%, and 19.5%) and elbow flexors (EF) (11.4%, 25.3%, 25.1%, and 25%) in G20, G40, G60, and G80, respectively (p>.05). G80 showed higher CSA than G20 for VL (19.5% vs. 8.9%) and EF (25% vs. 11.4%) at post-12 weeks (p<.05). There was time effect for elbow flexion and unilateral leg press strength for all groups post-12 weeks (p<.05). However, the magnitude of increase was higher in G60 and G80. In conclusion, when low to high intensities of RT are performed with volume-matched, all intensities were effective for increasing muscle strength and size; however, 20% 1RM was suboptimal in this regard, and only the heavier RT intensity (80% 1RM) was shown superior for increasing strength and CSA compared to low intensities.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 780
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of resistance training at different intensities of load on cross-education of muscle strength
    Pelet, Danyelle C. S.
    Orsatti, Fabio L.
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2021, 46 (10) : 1279 - 1289
  • [2] Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lukas Moesgaard
    Mikkel Malling Beck
    Lasse Christiansen
    Per Aagaard
    Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2022, 52 : 1647 - 1666
  • [3] Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Moesgaard, Lukas
    Beck, Mikkel Malling
    Christiansen, Lasse
    Aagaard, Per
    Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 52 (07) : 1647 - 1666
  • [4] Acute Mechanical and Metabolic Responses to Different Resistance Training Protocols With Equated Volume Load
    Sanchez-Moreno, Miguel
    Rodiles-Guerrero, Luis
    Rendeiro-Pinho, Goncalo
    Prieto-Veloso, Antonio
    Pareja-Blanco, Fernando
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2023, 18 (04) : 402 - 413
  • [5] The Influence Training Load and Volume on Anabolic Signalling and Muscle Hypertrophy with Resistance Training
    Mitchell, Cameron
    Churchward-Venne, Tyler
    Selby, Keegan
    West, Dan
    Burd, Nicholas
    Baker, Steven
    Phillips, Stuart
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2011, 43 (05): : 53 - 54
  • [6] Resistance Training Volume Enhances Muscle Hypertrophy but Not Strength in Trained Men
    Schoenfeld, Brad J.
    Contreras, Bret
    Krieger, James
    Grgic, Jozo
    Delcastillo, Kenneth
    Belliard, Ramon
    Alto, Andrew
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (01): : 94 - 103
  • [7] Effect of different resistance intensities in combined training on muscle strength response in COPD
    Gianjoppe-Santos, Julia
    Barusso-Gruninger, Marina Sallum
    Di Lorenzo, Valeria Amorim Pires
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50
  • [8] The effects of ibuprofen on muscle hypertrophy, strength, and soreness during resistance training
    Krentz, Joel R.
    Quest, Braden
    Farthing, Jonathan P.
    Quest, Dale W.
    Chilibeck, Philip D.
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2008, 33 (03) : 470 - 475
  • [9] Effects of resistance training under hypoxic conditions on muscle hypertrophy and strength
    Kurobe, Kazumichi
    Huang, Zhong
    Nishiwaki, Masato
    Yamamoto, Masayoshi
    Kanehisa, Hiroaki
    Ogita, Futoshi
    [J]. CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2015, 35 (03) : 197 - 202
  • [10] Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    LOPEZ, P. E. D. R. O.
    RADAELLI, ReGIS
    TAAFFE, D. E. N. N. I. S. R.
    NEWTON, R. O. B. E. R. T. U.
    GALVAO, D. A. N. I. E. L. A.
    TRAJANO, G. A. B. R. I. E. L. S.
    TEODORO, J. U. L. I. A. N. A. L.
    KRAEMER, W. I. L. L. I. A. M. J.
    HaKKINEN, K. E. I. J. O.
    PINTO, R. O. N. E. I. S.
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2021, 53 (06) : 1206 - 1216