Beyond New and Appropriate: Who Decides What Is Creative?
被引:148
|
作者:
Kaufman, James C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Psychol, Learning Res Inst, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USACalif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Psychol, Learning Res Inst, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
Kaufman, James C.
[1
]
Baer, John
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Rider Univ, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USACalif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Psychol, Learning Res Inst, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
Baer, John
[2
]
机构:
[1] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Psychol, Learning Res Inst, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) is a common creativity assessment. According to this technique, the best judges of creativity are qualified experts. Yet what does it mean to be an expert in a domain? What level of expertise is needed to rate creativity? This article reviews the literature on novice, expert, and quasi-expert creativity ratings. Although current research indicates that novices may be poor choices to be CAT raters, quasi-experts may represent a compromise between ideal scientific rigor and practical time and budget restrictions. Certain guidelines are suggested to make the selection of experts more streamlined, including paying attention to which domain is being assessed.
机构:
Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
Connecticut Childresn Med Ctr, Pediatr Cardiothrac Surg, Hartford, CT USAYale New Haven Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New Haven, CT 06504 USA