Beyond New and Appropriate: Who Decides What Is Creative?

被引:148
|
作者
Kaufman, James C. [1 ]
Baer, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Psychol, Learning Res Inst, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA
[2] Rider Univ, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USA
关键词
CONSENSUAL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE; CHILDRENS CREATIVITY; ARTISTIC CREATIVITY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; EXPERTISE; MODEL; JUDGMENTS; WRITERS; EYE;
D O I
10.1080/10400419.2012.649237
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) is a common creativity assessment. According to this technique, the best judges of creativity are qualified experts. Yet what does it mean to be an expert in a domain? What level of expertise is needed to rate creativity? This article reviews the literature on novice, expert, and quasi-expert creativity ratings. Although current research indicates that novices may be poor choices to be CAT raters, quasi-experts may represent a compromise between ideal scientific rigor and practical time and budget restrictions. Certain guidelines are suggested to make the selection of experts more streamlined, including paying attention to which domain is being assessed.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条